Changes for page North Hollywood Stern Neg
Summary
-
Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 2 removed)
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[75]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,5 +1,0 @@ 1 -A. Interpretation - Aff must defend the hypothetical enactment of a plan under the scope of the resolution. 2 - 3 -A. Interpretation - The Affirmative must defend a limit of qualified immunity for police officers – to clarify, they can’t defend its abolition altogether. 4 - 5 -A. Interpretation - Aff may only defend a limitation on qualified immunity. To clarify, they can’t defend a limitation on qualified immunity plus something else. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-02-12 21:11:20.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -X - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -X - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -37 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -9 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -North Hollywood Stern Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NOVDEC T Interps - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -X
- Caselist.RoundClass[37]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -75,76,77,78,79,80 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-02-12 21:11:18.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -X - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -X - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -9 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -X