| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,21 @@ |
|
1 |
+Oxford Dictionary defines negate as to “deny the existence of” – the only way for me to negate and meet my side burden is disproving the existence of the AC. |
|
2 |
+Actions are contingent upon the unity of their phases. |
|
3 |
+Rodl, Sebastian. “Self-Consciousness,” Harvard University Press, 2000. |
|
4 |
+Calculation from desire… be doing B. |
|
5 |
+To endorse a proposition means to believe in its consequences. |
|
6 |
+Wedgwood, Ralph. Philosopher @ USC; Ph.D. from Cornell. 2006. “The Meaning of ‘Ought’,” Oxford Studies in Metaethics: Volume 1. http://www-bcf.usc.edu/~wedgwood/meaningofought.htm. |
|
7 |
+A simpler but… so too is ‘OA, t (p)’. |
|
8 |
+One must identify with their choice to be the cause of an action. |
|
9 |
+Korsgaard, Christine M. Professor of Philosophy at Harvard University. 1999. “Self-Constitution in the Ethics of Plato and Kant,” The Journal of Ethics, Vol. 3, No. 1. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/25115598.pdf. |
|
10 |
+Now I'm going… which you act. |
|
11 |
+Universities and colleges are moral agents who are guided by morality – my syllogism also applies to them. |
|
12 |
+Laurence, Ben. Assistant Professor in the Department of Philosophy and the College, University of Chicago. “An Anscombean Approach to Collective Action.” http://philosophy.uchicago.edu/faculty/files/laurence/Anscombean_Collective_Action_Final.pdf. |
|
13 |
+But even if… a practical syllogism. |
|
14 |
+Thus, a sufficient Neg burden is to prove the AC impossible. |
|
15 |
+Thus, I contend that not restricting free speech is impossible. |
|
16 |
+1 Censorship is literally inevitable – there’s nothing that can be done to totally remove it. |
|
17 |
+Jacobson, Daniel, prof of philosophy @ Michigan, Freedom of Speech under Assault on Campus, CATO POLICY ANALYSIS NO. 796, 8-30-16. |
|
18 |
+The traditional objection… free speech immunity.8 |
|
19 |
+2 Even in the status quo, there is no such thing as “free speech.” |
|
20 |
+Loury, Glenn C. (Prof of Philosophy @ BU) "Self-Censorship in Public Discourse: A Theory of "Political Correctness" and Related Phenomena." Rationality and Society (2010): n. pag. Print. Premier |
|
21 |
+It is in… can become entrenched. |