Summary

• Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[4]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[4]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,17 +1,0 @@
1		-Oxford dictionary defines nuclear power as: “a country that has nuclear weapons,” meaning that the Aff advocacy bans the production of countries with nuclear weapons in space.
2		-
3		-I propose instead: “All countries ought to allow the production of countries that have nuclear weapons in space, but prohibit the production of nuclear energy in space.”
4		-
5		-Oxford defines nuclear energy as: “The energy released during nuclear fission or fusion, especially when used to generate electricity.” My advocacy solves the Aff by solving for their advantages, while their advocacy does better than that, meaning that Neg solves the AC better than Aff.
6		-
7		-My CP has the net benefit of not being vague because vagueness kills policymaking. DeKoven and Lundblad:
8		-“Species Matters: Humane Advocacy and Cultural Theory,” 2012. Columbia University Press.
9		-Marianne DeKoven, author, professor at Rutgers; Michael Lundblad, author, professor at the University of Oslo
10		-
11		-When I learn... of the material.
12		-
13		-This also has the net benefit of allowing countries that are beneficial to Earth to be formed in space with a way to defend themselves. Worldbuilding:
14		-“Could you claim a space station as a country?” August 24, 2015. Worldbuilding.
15		-http://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/23250/could-you-claim-a-space-station-as-a-country
16		-
17		-Recognition of a... as a country.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2016-10-10 17:47:09.0

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Ryan Leigh

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Harker KS

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-4

Round

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-5

Team

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-North Hollywood Stern Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-SEPCT OCT Nuclear Power PIC vs Space Aff

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Voices