| ... |
... |
@@ -1,30
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-===Plan Text=== |
| 2 |
|
- |
| 3 |
|
- |
| 4 |
|
-====I propose: "Each of the 50 states of the United States of America shall follow Arizona's model and pass into law a bill that requires public colleges and universities in the state to eliminate free speech zones and replace them with monuments or memorials."==== |
| 5 |
|
-Richman, Jackson. Contributing Writer for Huffington Post; Formerly at The Weekly Standard and The Daily Caller. 5-31-2016, "Arizona Cracks Down on 'Free Speech Zones'," Daily Caller, http://dailycaller.com/2016/05/31/arizona-cracks-down-on-free-speech-zones/ |
| 6 |
|
-Two weeks ago, Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey signed a bill into law that |
| 7 |
|
-AND |
| 8 |
|
-a settlement if the court decides the school has restricted the student's speech. |
| 9 |
|
- |
| 10 |
|
- |
| 11 |
|
-===Competition=== |
| 12 |
|
- |
| 13 |
|
- |
| 14 |
|
-====The CP competes with the AC via net benefits – the federalism DA.==== |
| 15 |
|
- |
| 16 |
|
- |
| 17 |
|
-====Redundancy – Real life policymakers don't pass 2 policies that conflict while doing similar things – in a debate over plans and counter plans where we simulate policymakers, it destroys the meaning of having a round if you can make a perm and act unlike real life policymakers.==== |
| 18 |
|
- |
| 19 |
|
- |
| 20 |
|
-===Solvency=== |
| 21 |
|
- |
| 22 |
|
- |
| 23 |
|
-====CP solves case – it, too, removes free speech zones just as well as the Aff. The different actor means the CP solves better than case – the Aff doesn't spec which colleges and universities, so individual schools can opt out of the Aff, while individual schools can't opt of the CP as every public university in every state is legally required to follow the Aff. The Aff plan just says "public colleges and universities" without using a quantifier before this phrase – means that it applies to "public colleges and universities" as a kind instead of particular schools or all of them.==== |
| 24 |
|
-Eckert, Bennett. 3-time champion of Lincoln Douglas Debate at the Texas Forensic Association State Tournament and the 2016 National Speech and Debate Association's national champion. During the 2015-2016 school year, Bennett was one of the most successful debaters on the national circuit winning the Glenbrooks, Apple Valley, St. Mark's, Meadows, the Greenhill Round Robin, and the Apple Valley Round Robin. He now attends Northwestern University. "Topic Analysis by Bennet Eckert," from the 2017 Jan/Feb Champion Briefs. |
| 25 |
|
-Second, "colleges" and "universities" are bare plurals. That is |
| 26 |
|
-AND |
| 27 |
|
-Nebel's article led to the argument now known as "Nebel T").45 |
| 28 |
|
- |
| 29 |
|
- |
| 30 |
|
-====That has 2 implications – 1) plan flaw for the AC – individual schools can opt out of the AC under the assumption that other public colleges and universities will do the Aff – means that the Aff is "done" if 2 public universities enact it, while obviously that doesn't solve their AC, and 2) CP solves better (not just as well, but better) than case, so you vote Neg even under the AC ROTB.==== |