Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[30]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[57]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[30]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2016-12-19 05:34:31.5
	1	+2016-12-19 05:34:31.0

Caselist.CitesClass[57]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,28 @@
	1	+===Framework===
	2	+
	3	+
	4	+====We derive "oughts" and morality from the institutions within which they exist.====
	5	+Searle, John R. American philosopher and Professor of Philosophy at the University of California, Berkeley. 1964. "How to Derive "Ought" From "Is"," The Philosophical Review, Vol. 73, No. 1 (Jan., 1964), pp. 43-58.
	6	+In order to work toward this conclusion I can begin by saying that the picture
	7	+AND
	8	+play baseball I have committed myself to the observation of certain constitutive rules.
	9	+
	10	+
	11	+====Thus, the standard is upholding the purpose of institutions.====
	12	+
	13	+
	14	+====Thus, in order to derive morality for the actor in the res – public colleges and universities in the United States – it's a priori to view "is"s for universities, which is to educate students across the board.====
	15	+Chan, Brown, and Ludlow. Roy Y. Chan*, Boston College Gavin T. L. Brown, The University of Auckland Larry H. Ludlow, Boston College. April 5, 2014. "What is the purpose of higher education?: A comparison of institutional and student perspectives on the goals and purposes of completing a bachelor's degree in the 21st century," Paper presented at the annual American Education Research Association (AERA) conference. Philadelphia, PA: April 5, 2014.
	16	+It has long been advocated that higher education providers should teach undergraduate students a wide
	17	+AND
	18	+intellectual development (Palmer, Zajonic, Scribner, and Nepo, 2010).
	19	+
	20	+
	21	+===Contention===
	22	+
	23	+
	24	+====Thus, I contend that because colleges serve to educate students in dealing with assertions of others and communicating and they ought to do so, they ought to limit Constitutionally protected free speech.====
	25	+Byrne, Peter J. Associate Professor, Georgetown University Law Center. 1991. "Racial Insults and Free Speech Within the University," 79 Geo. L.J. 399.
	26	+The university's relationship to the speech of its members is fundamentally different from the state's
	27	+AND
	28	+justification for university regulation of speech beyond the curriculum has been insufficiently studied.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2016-12-19 05:34:33.612

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Felix Tan

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Harker EM

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+30

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+5

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+North Hollywood Stern Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Institution NC

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+College Prep