Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[28]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[51]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[28]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2016-12-19 05:22:49.671
	1	+2016-12-19 05:22:49.0

Caselist.CitesClass[51]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,70 @@
	1	+===Framework===
	2	+
	3	+
	4	+====Oxford Dictionary defines ought as "used to indicate something that is probable."====
	5	+
	6	+
	7	+====Prefer this definition because:====
	8	+
	9	+
	10	+====1. Predictability – Analytic====
	11	+
	12	+
	13	+====2. Resolvability –====
	14	+
	15	+
	16	+====a. There is no objective morality – if we debate over ethics or morality, there is no objective way to determine a winner.====
	17	+**Hellier**, Coel. Professor of Astrophysics at Keele University in the UK. July 29, 2013. https://coelsblog.wordpress.com/2013/07/29/six-reasons-why-objective-morality-is-nonsense/.
	18	+Lastly, and actually the strongest argument of all, no-one has ever
	19	+AND
	20	+Remove that subjective human opinion and the result is — literally — nonsensical.
	21	+
	22	+
	23	+====b. Analytic====
	24	+
	25	+
	26	+====3. Real World Education – Normal citizens in the US have little to no influence on policies implemented by the government.====
	27	+**Bullard**, Ben. Author at Personal Liberty. August 13, 2014. "The Average American Has 'Essentially Zero' Influence Over U.S. Policy," Personal Liberty. http://personalliberty.com/average-american-essentially-zero-influence-u-s-policy/.
	28	+An academic look into the driving forces behind American Federal policymaking concludes that the average
	29	+AND
	30	+virtually no voice in shaping Federal policy compared with the "economic elites."
	31	+
	32	+
	33	+====Analytic====
	34	+
	35	+
	36	+====4. Side Burdens – Oxford Dictionary defines negate as to "deny the existence of." Thus, if I show that we shouldn't do the Aff, I am not sufficiently negating – the way that Neg wins the round is denying the existence of colleges not restricting any free speech occurring.====
	37	+
	38	+
	39	+====5. Aff Ground –====
	40	+
	41	+
	42	+====a. Topic Lit – Analytic====
	43	+
	44	+
	45	+====b. Time Skew - Analytic====
	46	+
	47	+
	48	+====6. Neg Ground –====
	49	+
	50	+
	51	+====a. Topic Lit – Analytic====
	52	+
	53	+
	54	+====b. Limits – Analytic====
	55	+
	56	+
	57	+====Fairness is a voter – if I win that my ROTB is more fair than theirs, pref it because fairness is key to engagement – if they win their ROTB, that's only to be expected because they give themselves a huge advantage with it.====
	58	+
	59	+
	60	+====Thus, the ROTB is to evaluate the probability of the Aff occurring in the real world. In the context of this round, that means you vote Neg if I show that no restriction of free speech on college campuses is improbable in the status quo.====
	61	+
	62	+
	63	+===Contention===
	64	+
	65	+
	66	+====Thus, I contend that colleges not restricting free speech is improbable in the status quo. Restrictions on free speech are prevalent in American colleges – especially in the last few years, they've been gaining popularity – means the trend is headed in the opposite direction.====
	67	+**Burleigh**, Nina. American writer and journalist. May 26, 2016. "The Battle Against "Hate Speech" On College Campuses Give Rise To a Generation That Hates Speech." News Week. http://www.newsweek.com/2016/06/03/college- campus-free-speech-thought-police-463536.html.
	68	+More than half of America's colleges and universities now have restrictive speech codes. And
	69	+AND
	70	+verbal conduct" that potentially violates the civil rights of minorities and women.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2016-12-19 05:22:51.452

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Michael Harris

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Brentwood ELi

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+28

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+1

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+North Hollywood Stern Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+JANFEB Ought NC

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+College Prep