Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[26]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[45]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[26]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2016-12-04 20:30:13.808
	1	+2016-12-04 20:30:13.0

Caselist.CitesClass[45]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,55 @@
	1	+====Oxford Dictionary defines ought as "used to indicate something that is probable."====
	2	+
	3	+
	4	+====Prefer this definition because:====
	5	+
	6	+
	7	+====1. Predictability - Analytic====
	8	+
	9	+
	10	+====2. Resolvability –====
	11	+
	12	+
	13	+====a. There is no objective morality – if we debate over ethics or morality, there is no objective way to determine a winner.====
	14	+Hellier, Coel. Professor of Astrophysics at Keele University in the UK. July 29, 2013. https://coelsblog.wordpress.com/2013/07/29/six-reasons-why-objective-morality-is-nonsense/.
	15	+Lastly, and actually the strongest argument of all, no-one has ever
	16	+AND
	17	+Remove that subjective human opinion and the result is — literally — nonsensical.
	18	+
	19	+
	20	+====b. Analytic====
	21	+
	22	+
	23	+====3. Real World Education – Normal citizens in the US have little to no influence on policies implemented by the government.====
	24	+Bullard, Ben. Author at Personal Liberty. August 13, 2014. "The Average American Has 'Essentially Zero' Influence Over U.S. Policy," Personal Liberty. http://personalliberty.com/average-american-essentially-zero-influence-u-s-policy/.
	25	+An academic look into the driving forces behind American Federal policymaking concludes that the average
	26	+AND
	27	+virtually no voice in shaping Federal policy compared with the "economic elites."
	28	+
	29	+
	30	+====4. Side Burdens - Oxford Dictionary defines negate as to "deny the existence of."====
	31	+
	32	+
	33	+====5. Aff Ground –====
	34	+
	35	+
	36	+====a. Analytic====
	37	+
	38	+
	39	+====b. Analytic====
	40	+
	41	+
	42	+====6. Neg Ground –====
	43	+
	44	+
	45	+====a. Analytic====
	46	+
	47	+
	48	+====b. Analytic====
	49	+
	50	+
	51	+====Thus, a sufficient Neg burden is to prove a limitation on qualified immunity improbable in the status quo. I contend that a limitation on qualified immunity is not probable in the status quo. The trend is actually headed in the opposite direction – the Supreme Court is secretly expanding qi.====
	52	+Kinports 16, Kit. Pennsylvania State University, Penn State Law. February 22, 2016. "The Supreme Court's Quiet Expansion of Qualified Immunity," Penn State Law Research Paper No. 6-2016. http://www.minnesotalawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Kinports_PDF1.pdf.
	53	+In recent years, the Supreme Court opinions applying the qualified immunity defense have engaged
	54	+AND
	55	+government actors seeking immunity or the lower courts tasked with resolving their claims.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2016-12-04 20:30:15.730

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Michael Overing

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Cypress Bay SD

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+26

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+4

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+North Hollywood Stern Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+NOVDEC Ought NC

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Alta