Summary

• Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[45]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[45]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,58 +1,0 @@
1		-=Ought NC=
2		-
3		-
4		-====Oxford Dictionary defines ought as "used to indicate something that is probable."====
5		-
6		-
7		-====Prefer this definition because:====
8		-
9		-
10		-====Predictability - Analytic====
11		-
12		-
13		-====Resolvability –====
14		-
15		-
16		-====There is no objective morality – if we debate over ethics or morality, there is no objective way to determine a winner.====
17		-Hellier, Coel. Professor of Astrophysics at Keele University in the UK. July 29, 2013. https://coelsblog.wordpress.com/2013/07/29/six-reasons-why-objective-morality-is-nonsense/.
18		-Lastly, and actually the strongest argument of all, no-one has ever
19		-AND
20		-Remove that subjective human opinion and the result is — literally — nonsensical.
21		-
22		-
23		-====Analytic====
24		-
25		-
26		-====Real World Education – Normal citizens in the US have little to no influence on policies implemented by the government.====
27		-Bullard, Ben. Author at Personal Liberty. August 13, 2014. "The Average American Has 'Essentially Zero' Influence Over U.S. Policy," Personal Liberty. http://personalliberty.com/average-american-essentially-zero-influence-u-s-policy/.
28		-An academic look into the driving forces behind American Federal policymaking concludes that the average
29		-AND
30		-virtually no voice in shaping Federal policy compared with the "economic elites."
31		-
32		-
33		-====Side Burdens - Oxford Dictionary defines negate as to "deny the existence of." Analytic====
34		-
35		-
36		-====Aff Ground –====
37		-
38		-
39		-====Analytic====
40		-
41		-
42		-====Analytic====
43		-
44		-
45		-====Neg Ground –====
46		-
47		-
48		-====Analytic====
49		-
50		-
51		-====Analytic====
52		-
53		-
54		-====Thus, a sufficient Neg burden is to prove a limitation on qualified immunity improbable in the status quo. I contend that a limitation on qualified immunity is not probable in the status quo. The trend is actually headed in the opposite direction – the Supreme Court is secretly expanding qi.====
55		-Kinports 16, Kit. Pennsylvania State University, Penn State Law. February 22, 2016. "The Supreme Court's Quiet Expansion of Qualified Immunity," Penn State Law Research Paper No. 6-2016. http://www.minnesotalawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Kinports_PDF1.pdf.
56		-In recent years, the Supreme Court opinions applying the qualified immunity defense have engaged
57		-AND
58		-government actors seeking immunity or the lower courts tasked with resolving their claims.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2016-12-04 20:26:09.0

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Michael Overing

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Cypress Bay SD

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-26

Round

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-4

Team

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-North Hollywood Stern Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-NOVDEC Ought NC

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Alta