Changes for page North Hollywood Stern Aff
Summary
-
Objects (0 modified, 1 added, 4 removed)
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[27]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,6 +1,0 @@ 1 -Email: homerunmvp@gmail.com 2 -Facebook: Jack Stern (profile pic is a Google logo) 3 - 4 -I LOVE RUNNING DISCLOSURE THEORY!!! I'M A SOLO DEBATER WITH NO ONE ELSE FROM MY SCHOOL DOING CIRCUIT OR HELPING ME PREP BUT I STILL DISCLOSE, SO I DON'T WANT TO HEAR YOUR EXCUSES FOR NOT DISCLOSING. 5 - 6 -A. Interpretation - Debaters must disclose previously run constructive positions – all cases, off cases and theory arguments – at least 30 minutes before the round on the NDCA wiki. This means providing proper citations for all evidence including first three and last three words and tags as well as advocacy, standard, and interpretation texts. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-02-19 05:45:57.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -X - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -X - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -23 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -9 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -North Hollywood Stern Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Contact Info - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -X
- Caselist.CitesClass[28]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,9 +1,0 @@ 1 -A. Interpretation - Debaters must disclose previously run constructive positions – all cases, off cases and theory arguments – at least 30 minutes before the round on the NDCA wiki. This means providing proper citations for all evidence including first three and last three words and tags as well as advocacy, standard, and interpretation texts. 2 -A. Interpretation - If the negative reads an alternative advocacy, then he/she must defend it unconditionally. 3 -A. Interpretation - Neg may not defend implementation of a rejection of the Aff. 4 -A. Interpretation - Debaters may read at most 1 ROTB. 5 -A. Interpretation - Debaters may not defend a CP in CX if they didn't even mention the CP in their constructive speech. 6 -A. Interpretation - Debaters may not read CP's with solvency advocates. 7 -A. Interpretation - If debaters read a kritik with an alternative, they must specify a) the actor of the alt, b) exactly what the alt entails, c) whether or not they defend implementation of the alt, and d) what a world with the alt looks like if/when asked in CX. 8 -A. Interpretation – If the Neg reads a ROTB other than policymaking or finding the best liberation strategy for the materially oppressed, they must specify all of the implications of their ROTB. To clarify, they must include: 1) how theory and T function under their ROTB, 2) a warrant for every plank of their ROTB, 3) a weighing mechanism to weigh between different impacts, and 4) what Aff has to do to link offense back to their ROTB. 9 -A. Interpretation - If Neg reads a counter normative framework, they must read metaethical justifications for their framework. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-02-19 05:45:58.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -X - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -X - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -23 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -9 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -North Hollywood Stern Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Broken Interps - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -X
- Caselist.RoundClass[23]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -27,28 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-02-19 05:45:56.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -X - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -X - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -9 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -X
- Caselist.RoundClass[24]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-02-19 05:52:26.285 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Laurel Eddins - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Harker SX - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -3 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Berkeley
- Caselist.CitesClass[24]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,6 @@ 1 +A. Interpretation - Debaters must disclose previously run constructive positions – all cases, off cases and theory arguments – at least 30 minutes before the round on the NDCA wiki. This means providing proper citations for all evidence including first three and last three words and tags as well as advocacy, standard, and interpretation texts. 2 +A. Interpretation - If the negative reads an alternative advocacy, then he/she must defend it unconditionally. 3 +A. Interpretation - Neg may not defend implementation of a rejection of the Aff. 4 +A. Interpretation - Debaters may read at most 1 ROTB. 5 +A. Interpretation - Debaters may not defend a CP in CX if they didn't even mention the CP in their constructive speech. 6 +A. Interpretation - Debaters may not read CP's with solvency advocates. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-12 16:10:57.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +X - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +X - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +20 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +9 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +North Hollywood Stern Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Broken Interps - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +X