Changes for page North Hollywood Stern Aff
Summary
-
Objects (2 modified, 3 added, 3 removed)
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[23]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,6 +1,0 @@ 1 -Email: homerunmvp@gmail.com 2 -Facebook: Jack Stern (profile pic is a Google logo) 3 - 4 -I LOVE RUNNING DISCLOSURE THEORY!!! I'M A SOLO DEBATER WITH NO ONE ELSE FROM MY SCHOOL DOING CIRCUIT OR HELPING ME PREP BUT I STILL DISCLOSE, SO I DON'T WANT TO HEAR YOUR EXCUSES FOR NOT DISCLOSING. 5 - 6 -A. Interpretation - Debaters must disclose previously run constructive positions – all cases, off cases and theory arguments – at least 30 minutes before the round on the NDCA wiki. This means providing proper citations for all evidence including first three and last three words and tags as well as advocacy, standard, and interpretation texts. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-02-12 16:10:57.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -X - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -X - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -20 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -9 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -North Hollywood Stern Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Contact Info - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -X
- Caselist.CitesClass[24]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,6 +1,0 @@ 1 -A. Interpretation - Debaters must disclose previously run constructive positions – all cases, off cases and theory arguments – at least 30 minutes before the round on the NDCA wiki. This means providing proper citations for all evidence including first three and last three words and tags as well as advocacy, standard, and interpretation texts. 2 -A. Interpretation - If the negative reads an alternative advocacy, then he/she must defend it unconditionally. 3 -A. Interpretation - Neg may not defend implementation of a rejection of the Aff. 4 -A. Interpretation - Debaters may read at most 1 ROTB. 5 -A. Interpretation - Debaters may not defend a CP in CX if they didn't even mention the CP in their constructive speech. 6 -A. Interpretation - Debaters may not read CP's with solvency advocates. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-02-12 16:10:57.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -X - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -X - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -20 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -9 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -North Hollywood Stern Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Broken Interps - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -X
- Caselist.CitesClass[26]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ 8 8 Ideal theory fails – oversimplifying ethics to one theory threatens any real discussion. 9 9 Curry, Tommy J. Ph.D., Associate Professor of Philosophy, Texas AandM University. December 2014. “The Cost of a Thing: A Kingian Reformulation of a Living Wage Argument in the 21st Century,” Academia.edu. 10 10 Despite the pronouncement… contemporary moral parameters. 11 -Thus, the standard is minimizing structural violence. This means that the ROTB is to endorse the best liberation strategy for the oppressed. 11 +Thus, the standard is minimizing structural violence. This means that the ROTB is to endorse the best liberation strategy for the materially oppressed. 12 12 Part 2 is harms. 13 13 The entire political system in Mexico is corrupt and in need of reform. 14 14 Browne, Mark. Contributor, CNS News. 5-19-2016, "Corruption Concerns in Mexico Drive Growing Levels of Public Distrust in Gov’t," CNS News, http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/mark-browne/corruption-concerns-mexico-drive-growing-levels-public-distrust-govt ... ... @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ 24 24 Lee, Brianna. Covers U.S. immigration and Latin America for IBT. Previously she worked as a writer and editor at the Council on Foreign Relations and as a staff writer for the PBS news program "Need to Know." 9-3-2015, "Mexico's Economy: Rising Poverty, Inequality Undermine Peña Nieto's Economic Agenda," International Business Times, http://www.ibtimes.com/mexicos-economy-rising-poverty-inequality-undermine-pena-nietos-economic-agenda-2080010 25 25 The figures alone… across the board. 26 26 Part 3 is the plan. 27 -Thus, the plan: “Public colleges and universities in the United States of Mexico oughtnot restrict any constitutionally protected speech.”27 +Thus, the plan: “Public colleges and universities in the United States of Mexico shall not restrict any constitutionally protected speech.” 28 28 Part 4 is solvency. 29 29 The “Yo Soy 132” movement that opposes corruption in politics, society, and the media is primarily composed of and was created by college students who opposed the government. 30 30 Treré, Emiliano. Associate Professor, Department of Communication and Journalism, Faculty of Political and Social Sciences, Autonomous University of Querétaro (Mexico). 5-11-2012, "Civic Media Project: The #YoSoy132 Movement in Mexico," Civic Media Project, http://civicmediaproject.org/works/civic-media-project/yosoy132movement - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2017-02-1 302:58:37.9671 +2017-02-15 03:57:22.0
- Caselist.RoundClass[20]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -23,24 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-02-12 16:10:54.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -X - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -X - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -9 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -X
- Caselist.RoundClass[22]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +26 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2017-02-1 302:58:36.01 +2017-02-15 03:57:20.0
- Caselist.CitesClass[27]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,6 @@ 1 +Email: homerunmvp@gmail.com 2 +Facebook: Jack Stern (profile pic is a Google logo) 3 + 4 +I LOVE RUNNING DISCLOSURE THEORY!!! I'M A SOLO DEBATER WITH NO ONE ELSE FROM MY SCHOOL DOING CIRCUIT OR HELPING ME PREP BUT I STILL DISCLOSE, SO I DON'T WANT TO HEAR YOUR EXCUSES FOR NOT DISCLOSING. 5 + 6 +A. Interpretation - Debaters must disclose previously run constructive positions – all cases, off cases and theory arguments – at least 30 minutes before the round on the NDCA wiki. This means providing proper citations for all evidence including first three and last three words and tags as well as advocacy, standard, and interpretation texts. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-15 03:58:45.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +X - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +X - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +23 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +9 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +North Hollywood Stern Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Contact Info - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +X
- Caselist.CitesClass[28]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,7 @@ 1 +A. Interpretation - Debaters must disclose previously run constructive positions – all cases, off cases and theory arguments – at least 30 minutes before the round on the NDCA wiki. This means providing proper citations for all evidence including first three and last three words and tags as well as advocacy, standard, and interpretation texts. 2 +A. Interpretation - If the negative reads an alternative advocacy, then he/she must defend it unconditionally. 3 +A. Interpretation - Neg may not defend implementation of a rejection of the Aff. 4 +A. Interpretation - Debaters may read at most 1 ROTB. 5 +A. Interpretation - Debaters may not defend a CP in CX if they didn't even mention the CP in their constructive speech. 6 +A. Interpretation - Debaters may not read CP's with solvency advocates. 7 +A. Interpretation - If debaters read a kritik with an alternative, they must specify a) the actor of the alt, b) exactly what the alt entails, c) whether or not they defend implementation of the alt, and d) what a world with the alt looks like if/when asked in CX. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-15 03:58:46.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +X - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +X - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +23 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +9 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +North Hollywood Stern Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Broken Interps - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +X
- Caselist.RoundClass[24]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-19 00:18:20.937 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +X - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +X - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +9 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +X