Changes for page North Crowley Reed Neg
Last modified by Administrator on 2017/08/29 03:38
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Caselist.RoundClass[60]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2017-02-23 19:43:52. 6801 +2017-02-23 19:43:52.0
- Caselist.CitesClass[70]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,13 @@ 1 +Interpretation- Unconditional affirmative advocacies must be grammatically coherent. 2 +To clarify, your advocacy text must not be vague/ ambiguous 3 +Violation: 4 + 5 +Violation: 6 + 7 +Impact- Lack of definitional clarity undermines the implementation of your advocacy- kills your ability to solve 8 +Crawford 1 (Gordon, Lecturer in Development Studies @ University of Leeds, Foreign Aid and Political Reform: A Comparative Analysis and Political Conditionality, 2001, pg.29-30) 9 +A range of analysts have commented that a feature of the main concepts – human rights, democracy and good governance – is their contested nature and that their introduction into development assistance is characterized by a lack of conceptual clarity, with repercussions for policy coherence. The only possible exception is human rights, benefiting from greater definitional specificity through its incorporation into international law. Pertinently, Burnell (1994, p. 488) noted that clarity of aims and objectives is essential for effective policy implementation, with negative implications if concepts are insufficiently well defined. 10 + 11 +And, Standards- advocacy shift 12 + 13 +jurisdiction - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-23 19:43:55.376 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Rutter, Melin, McGee - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Collyville Heritage AltS - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +60 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Semis - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +North Crowley Reed Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1-Plan flaw - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +UNT