Summary

• Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[37]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[37]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,15 +1,0 @@
1		-JK its limits T
2		-
3		-Interp: The affirmative must not defend the abolishment of qualified immunity. Limit means to reduce:
4		-Oxford Learner’s Dictionariesworld’s largest repository of information about the English language, Oxford Dictionaries is part of Oxford University Press (OUP), a department of the University of Oxford. A global organization, covering major languages such as English, Chinese, Arabic, Spanish, French, and Portuguese, and less widely spoken ones such as isiZulu and Malay, “Limit,” http://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/us/definition/english/limit_2,
5		-
6		-to restrict or reduce the amount of something that you or somebody can have or use
7		-
8		-1. limits
9		-2. Field usage- specifically in a legal context, limitations require restriction of the law – government debates are about restrictions and modifications on current programs not complete elimination
10		-Brian Tamanaha 07William Gardiner Hammond Professor of Law, renowned jurisprudence and law and society scholar, and the author of eight books and numerous scholarly articles “A CONCISE GUIDE TO THE RULE OF LAW,” ST. JOHN’S UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW, LEGAL STUDIES RESEARCH PAPER SERIES, SEPTEMBER 2007, http://content.csbs.utah.edu/~dlevin/conlaw/tamanaha-rule-of-law.pdf, ghsBZ
11		-The second type of legal restraint imposes restrictions on the law itself, erecting limitations on the law making power of the government. Under this second type of restraint, certain prohibited actions cannot be legally allowed, even by a legitimate lawmaking authority. Legal restrictions of this sort rank above (control over) ordinary lawmaking. The most familiar versions of this are: 1) constitutionally imposed limits, 2) transnational or international legal limits, 3) human rights limits, and 4) religious or natural law limits. In different ways and senses, these types of law are superior to and impose restraints upon routine law making. The first two versions share a quality described above in that the limits they impose can be changed by legal bodies, but they are nonetheless distinct in that alterations usually cannot be made in the ordinary course by the government subject to the limitation. Constitutionally imposed limitations and transnational or international legal requirements are often more difficult to modify than ordinary legislation—as when a higher threshold must be overcome or changes must be effectuated by a different law making body. Constitutional amendments, for example, may require a supermajority vote while ordinary legislation requires only a majority vote, or must be made by a special body with a constitutional mandate; changes in transnational or international law rules must be effectuated by transnational or international institutions, and thus are beyond the power of the nation state to unilaterally alter. These heightened hurdles enhance the efficacy of the legal limits.
12		-And- field usage first in determining if they are T
13		-analytic
14		-3. policy edu
15		-4. jurisdiction

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2016-12-03 01:01:33.0

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Brady Lu

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Connal AW

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-37

Round

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-1

Team

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-North Crowley Reed Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-3- also-totally-unique-T-shell-youve-never-seen

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-UT Austin