| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,15 @@ |
|
1 |
+CHEATING TO THE EXTREME |
|
2 |
+Counter interpretation- |
|
3 |
+ affirmatives may limit QI by reducing it’s prescribed bounds. |
|
4 |
+Blacks law Dictionary defines limit http://thelawdictionary.org/limit/ |
|
5 |
+In General, this is a boundary of scope, be it authority, power, privilege, or right. Prescribed bounds. |
|
6 |
+This means that I am topical- analytic |
|
7 |
+Prefer- |
|
8 |
+1. I am textually topical. Textuality comes first analytic |
|
9 |
+2. Finding the ‘best’ way to engage the topic is BULLSHIT IVORY TOWER- analytic |
|
10 |
+ |
|
11 |
+A few implications- |
|
12 |
+a. This is defense on their standards |
|
13 |
+analytic |
|
14 |
+b. Theres no way to mediate between competing textuality standards- even if your interp is externally better for debate, I still resolve the internal question of if I am textually topical. |
|
15 |
+3. The entire aff is a net benefit to my interp- analytic |