| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,39 @@ |
|
1 |
+====LINK: The aff has no chance of solvency. Whiteness uses blackness as its inferior opposite this perception occurs primarily in the unconscious and makes all negative material impacts inevitable for the black. The affirmative does not challenge the unconscious criminalization of black bodies allows immunity asks as a mask by assuming it can change unconscious racism. ==== |
|
2 |
+LAWRENCE Professor of Law @ Stanford University 1987 Charles; "The Id, the Ego, and Equal Protection: Reckoning with Unconscious Racism" Stanford Law Review, Vol. 39, No. 2 (Jan., 1987), pp. 317-388 |
|
3 |
+This article's discussion of the stigma theory has anticipated the third likely challenge to my |
|
4 |
+AND |
|
5 |
+without looking to their perception—they don't perceive niggas getting shot as unjust |
|
6 |
+ |
|
7 |
+ |
|
8 |
+====LINK: Judge bias is rooted within Unconscious Racism- the affs focus on individuals nullifying in perceived injustices advances the disease of unconscious racism rather than acting it completely. ==== |
|
9 |
+LAWRENCE Professor of Law @ Stanford University 1987 Charles; "The Id, the Ego, and Equal Protection: Reckoning with Unconscious Racism" Stanford Law Review, Vol. 39, No. 2 (Jan., 1987), pp. 317-388 |
|
10 |
+It may often be appropriate for the legal system to disregard the influence of the |
|
11 |
+AND |
|
12 |
+the socioeconomic ladder, only their own inferiority can explain their subordinate position. |
|
13 |
+ |
|
14 |
+ |
|
15 |
+====MUST WEIGHING - Reps Weighing==== |
|
16 |
+ |
|
17 |
+ |
|
18 |
+====You should prefer the links to the representation of jury nullification versus just one instance of jury nullification for two reasons:==== |
|
19 |
+ |
|
20 |
+ |
|
21 |
+====1. The aff defends that jury nullification is a good idea and that it ought to be used, if we show a reason why the idea of jury nullification and what it represents is bad then that is a reason why the concept of jury nullification still links to the Kritik==== |
|
22 |
+ |
|
23 |
+ |
|
24 |
+====2. Representation is a prerequisite to the action it self—questioning the validity of what something represents in a larger structural way is important to understanding how the concept of jury nullification is used rather than just if the action is good in one instance. ==== |
|
25 |
+ |
|
26 |
+ |
|
27 |
+===Impact=== |
|
28 |
+ |
|
29 |
+ |
|
30 |
+====B. IMPACT: THE AFFIRMATIVE'S USE OF NULLIFICATION AS A WAY IN WHICH PEOPLE CAN SIMPLY GET OVER THEY PHSYCOLOANLTYICAL UNCONISOUSS PATHOLOGIES OF BLACKNESS ALLOWS US TO ASSUME HISTORICALLY RACIST INDIVUDALS WILL ACTU JUSTLY GIVEN THE CHOICE. ~~Curry~~ Curry, Tommy J. ~~doctor in Associate Professor of Philosophy, Affiliated Professor of Africana Studies, Texas A and M University~~ In the Fiat of Dreams: The Delusional Allure of Hope, the Reality of Anti-Black Violence and the Demands of the Anti-Ethical. 2013. ==== |
|
31 |
+Traditionally we have |
|
32 |
+onto immoral entities. |
|
33 |
+ |
|
34 |
+ |
|
35 |
+===Alt=== |
|
36 |
+====We should be antiethical and never assume white morality will save black lives. ==== |
|
37 |
+====~~Curry~~ Curry, Tommy J. ~~doctor in Associate Professor of Philosophy, Affiliated Professor of Africana Studies, Texas A and M University~~ In the Fiat of Dreams: The Delusional Allure of Hope, the Reality of Anti-Black Violence and the Demands of the Anti-Ethical. 2013. ==== |
|
38 |
+Anti-ethics; the call |
|
39 |
+nigger-souls, is totalizing. |