| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,11 @@ |
|
1 |
+Link-The Chinese are expanding their naval fleet which can ruin US global hegemony. US nuclear submarine expansion k2 check it Majumdar 16 Dave Majumdar has been covering defense since 2004. He has written for Flight International, Defense News and C4ISR Journal. Majumdar studied Strategic Studies at the University of Calgary and is a student of naval history. "Could the US Navy Really Hunt Down Russian or Chinese Submarines?" August 12, 2016 http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/could-the-us-navy-really-hunt-down-russian-or-chinese-17346 |
|
2 |
+Meanwhile, on the other side of the world, |
|
3 |
+our Littoral Combat Ships up to our supercarriers, and we notice." |
|
4 |
+ |
|
5 |
+Impact-Chinese expansionism can escalate to a nuclear sea war. Symonds 16 Peter Symonds is on the main editorial board for the World Socialist Editorial Board which aims to meet the need, felt widely today, for an intelligent appraisal of the problems of contemporary society. It addresses itself to the masses of people who are dissatisfied with the present state of social life, as well as its cynical and reactionary treatment by the establishment media. "US-China underwater rivalry in South China Sea" July 28, 2016 https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2016/07/28/scse-j28.html |
|
6 |
+The US has justified its confrontational stance |
|
7 |
+ is directly adjacent to the South China Sea. |
|
8 |
+ |
|
9 |
+(Extra card) US nuclear submarines are k2 combatting Chinese naval forces Symonds 16 Peter Symonds is on the main editorial board for the World Socialist Editorial Board which aims to meet the need, felt widely today, for an intelligent appraisal of the problems of contemporary society. It addresses itself to the masses of people who are dissatisfied with the present state of social life, as well as its cynical and reactionary treatment by the establishment media. "US-China underwater rivalry in South China Sea" July 28, 2016 https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2016/07/28/scse-j28.html |
|
10 |
+The Pentagon, however, is determined |
|
11 |
+ to need to maintain that asymmetric advantage." |