Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[5]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[5]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[5]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2016-12-17 03:45:38.602
	1	+2016-12-17 03:45:38.0

Caselist.CitesClass[5]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,23 @@
	1	+If I win that the constitution is a good method of evaluation then you should affirm. The constitution affirms tautologically because the constitution mandates that free speech not be restricted in all cases where the constitution would protect it. Moreover, the constitution is a living document with interpretations constantly in flux, which means it can be revised. In turn this means that any disads about the speech we might allow are non-intrinsic because future members of the Supreme Court can always rule that the first amendment doesn’t protect those.
	2	+The role of the judge is to play the part of a federal court judge. The ballot is a referendum on constitutionality. The Affirmative must prove that the restrictions of any constitutionally protected speech are unconstitutional and should end. The Negative must engage in a refutation of the plan by demonstrating that the restriction overturned is constitutional and therefore merits maintaining it.
	3	+
	4	+===Our framework provides the balance between two poles of impractical legal education – the non-prescriptive nature of critique debates and the directly prescriptive model of debate that occurs in the vacuum of legal reality. The debate should center on actions that the government can and cannot take in connection with the legal justification for said action. Moving away from this framework tips the scale toward education without utility.
	5	+Edwards, 92 ===(Harry T., circuit judge in the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, "The Growing Disjunction between Legal Education and the Legal Profession," Michigan Law Review, vol. 91, no. 1, October, p. JSTOR)
	6	+
	7	+The growing disjunction… to legal problems.
	8	+
	9	+This type of education is a fundamental prerequisite to addressing legislative and executive courses of action. Debate can be a training ground that provides us with the best understanding of what decisions are made, how they are made, and the interconnectedness of legal restraint. Only the AFF framework provides us with the building blocks to make effective policy advocacy. ===Wishing policies into existence, absent a discussion of existing legal regimes, ignores vital components of policymaking.
	10	+Edwards, 92=== (Harry T., circuit judge in the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, "The Growing Disjunction between Legal Education and the Legal Profession," Michigan Law Review, vol. 91, no. 1, October, p. JSTOR)
	11	+
	12	+To prevent superfluous… persuade the decision-maker.
	13	+
	14	+Our legal consciousness is an accumulation of knowledge and interaction with legal play. ===The AFF’s framework for debate creates a nuanced discussion of jurisprudence. That skill-set is vital to creating an informed citizenry who can deploy a rights conscious approach in everyday life.
	15	+Young, 9=== (Kathryne, postdoctoral fellow at Stanford's Lane Center for the American West, Assistant Professor of Sociology at the University of Massachusetts, “Rights consciousness in criminal procedure: a theoretical and empirical inquiry," Sociology of Crime, Law, and Deviance, vol. 12, 67-95, www.kathrynemyoung.com/uploads/2/4/8/6/2486969/rights_consciousness_in_crim_pro_young.pdf)
	16	+
	17	+In the past… of their rights.
	18	+
	19	+===Legal education is a prerequisite to political inquiry and engagement ~-~~-~- our framework forces debaters to engage in legal processes in order to understand what is possible under the law before prescribing action.
	20	+Epstein 85===(James Parker Hall Distinguished Service Professor Emeritus of Law and Senior Lecturer at the University of Chicago Law School, The Laurence A. Tisch Professor of Law, New York University School of Law, The Peter and Kirsten Bedford Senior Fellow, The Hoover Institution, and a senior lecturer at the University of Chicago
	21	+(Richard A., “Positive and Normative Elements in Legal Education,” in 8 Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 255, 1985,)) http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2236andcontext=journal_articles)//cch
	22	+
	23	+Legal education is… set of possibilities.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2016-12-17 03:45:40.775

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Mark Ahlstrom

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+West Des Moines Valley CR

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+5

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+3

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+New Trier Schwabe Aff

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+JF Lawyers AC

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Blake