Summary

• Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[1]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[1]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,69 +1,0 @@
1		-I affirm.
2		-===What constitutes an agent provides the needed context to determine what it means to be good or bad.
3		-Geach:=== Geach, P.T. “Good and Evil.” Analysis 17.2 (1956): 33-42. Web.
4		-
5		-There is no… a good deer-stalker.
6		-
7		-Operates on a higher epistemic level than the NC- moral actions must be contextualized to the agent performing them otherwise obligations cease to have meaning because we would be forced to perform contradictory actions under infinite obligations. Thus contextualizing the agent is a prerequisite to determining obligation.
8		-
9		-===Only constitutivism provides an internal standard of success which solves infinite regress.
10		-Katsafanas:=== Paul (Boston University) “Constitutivism about practical reasons” March 6th 2014
11		-
12		-Normative claims make… claim to authority.
13		-
14		-The constitutive standard is what we hold an agent to to determine whether an agent is effective or defective. For example the constitutive standard for a chair would be whether or not it could be sat on, for if it could not be sat on then it would be regarded as defective. Thus, obligation stems from fulfilliment of the constitutive standard.
15		-The topical agent of the resolution is public colleges and universities whose constitutive standard is intellectual preparation of the minds of its students.
16		-===Fortino :===
17		-(Andres, 2012, Ph.D, Principal and professor at NYU, Partner at Paradigm Research International)
18		-
19		-===The purpose of… of commercializing education. And, the constitutive purpose of educational institutions requires the preservation free and open discourse.
20		-Escotet: ===(Miguel Angel, 2012, University professor in Social and Psychological research, Ph.D)
21		-
22		-What is the… ‘training’ school system.
23		-
24		-I observe: restrictions on constitutionally protected speech are widespread in the status quo. In the U.S.’s only nationwide database of college speech policies, the Spotlight Database by FIRE(Foundation for Individual Rights in Education),
25		-55 of schools got a red light, which is when an institution has at least one policy that both clearly and substantially restricts freedom of speech.
26		-39 of schools got a yellow light, which is when an institution is one whose policies restrict a more limited amount of protected expression or, by virtue of their vague wording, could too easily be used to restrict protected expression.
27		-4 of schools got a green light (19 schools total) were free of free speech restrictions. 2015
28		-
29		-===These restrictions are predicated on preventing bullying
30		-Kingkade ‘14=== (Senior Editor at the Huffington Post, “Majority of Colleges Restrict Free Speech on Campus”, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/01/21/colleges-restrict-free-speech-fire-report_n_4633542.html).
31		-
32		-Some of the… “ridiculing”and “insulting”.
33		-
34		-Contention 1:
35		-===Restrictions lead to a culture of vindictive protectiveness and fear
36		-Lukianoff and Haidt, ‘15===, (Greg (attorney and CEO of FIRE) and Jonathan(social psyhcologist and Professor of Ethical Leadership at NYU), September issue, The Atlantic, “The Coddling of the American Mind”, http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2015/09/the-coddling-of-the-american-mind/399356/).
37		-
38		-The press has… aggression, or worse.
39		-
40		-===Culture of fear destroys intellectual preparedness
41		-Lukianoff and Haidt (2), ‘15===, (Greg (attorney and CEO of FIRE) and Jonathan(social psyhcologist and Professor of Ethical Leadership at NYU), September issue, The Atlantic, “The Coddling of the American Mind”, http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2015/09/the-coddling-of-the-american-mind/399356/).
42		-
43		-There’s a saying… to think pathologically.
44		-
45		-Contention 2:
46		-===Overfocus on bullying protection gives way to one-dimensional narratives
47		-Gilden ‘11,=== (J.D. Brown, Grey Fellow at Stanford Law School, Assistant Law Professor at Willamette University, “Cyberbullying and the Innocence Narrative”, Harvard Law Review, http://harvardcrcl.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/CRCL_Gilden_print-version.pdf
48		-
49		-
50		-Recent debates about… and sexual experiences.
51		-
52		-===One-dimensional LGBT narratives a disservice to LGBT empowerment~-~- causes epistemic violence which destroys intellectual preparedness
53		-Gilden ‘11===, (J.D. Brown, Grey Fellow at Stanford Law School, Assistant Law Professor at Willamette University, “Cyberbullying and the Innocence Narrative”, Harvard Law Review, http://harvardcrcl.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/CRCL_Gilden_print-version.pdf
54		-
55		-The innocence narrative… silence and exclusion.
56		-
57		-Underview:
58		- First drop the argument on NEG theory drop the debater on AFF theory.
59		-Neg abuse is far worse because the 7-4 makes it so that it actively prevents me from winning the round whereas any abuse in the 1AC can be adapted to proving no ground loss.
60		-It would deter the NEG from reading bad or irrelevant theory as a crutch and foster more educational topical debate—this proves uniqueness because the 1AR is already too short to waste time with a dumb shell.
61		-The 6-3 rebuttal skew means that they have enough time to win both theory and substance in the 2NR—while the 2AR only has time to win one of them, which means only the NEG, should be dropped.
62		-
63		-Second: Interps that indict theory spikes aren’t offensive
64		-Logically my spikes are theoretical interpretations to begin with which means you’re answers would be counter interps and not automatically offensive.
65		-Reciprocity, my spikes aren’t offensive arguments, i.e there is no voter attached as of the 1AC so the ability to read theory against them would just deny my interpretation not apply to a higher layer
66		-
67		-Third: Fairness is not a voter for the negative—the 1NC is reactive which means that they’ll always have the opportunity to match however unfair the 1AC is an adjust their 1NC to meet it, this is not true for the AFF because I’m forced to read an AFF without knowing what the 1NC will be.
68		-
69		-Fourth: Evaluate the round with a role of the ballot of voting for the debater who best determines the truth or falsity of the resolution. Key to text- to negate means “to deny the existence or truth of,”, so the most predictable distributions of burdens is truth and falsity since the text is all we have going into the round.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2016-12-16 21:03:35.0

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Mark Ahlstrom

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-West Des Moines Valley CR

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-1

Round

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2

Team

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-New Trier Schwabe Aff

Title

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Constitutivism AC

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Blake