| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,22 @@ |
|
1 |
+====need to universalize agent-specific reasons==== |
|
2 |
+**Lerm 1 summarizes** |
|
3 |
+~~Lerm, Jessica. "Second-personal reasons: why we need something like them, but why there are actually no such things," South African Journal of Philosophy31.2 (2012): 328-339.~~ Note: the author disagrees with the conclusion of the NC. |
|
4 |
+Agent-neutral reasons are to be distinguished from agent-relative reasons,2 |
|
5 |
+AND |
|
6 |
+possible solutions to the puzzle: Hobbes', and the neo-Kantians'. |
|
7 |
+ |
|
8 |
+ |
|
9 |
+====generates obligation==== |
|
10 |
+**Lerm 2 summarizes** |
|
11 |
+~~Lerm, Jessica. "Second-personal reasons: why we need something like them, but why there are actually no such things," South African Journal of Philosophy31.2 (2012): 328-339.~~ Note: the author disagrees with the conclusion of the NC. |
|
12 |
+The Hobbesian proposal Thomas Hobbes offers a solution to this puzzle of moral reasons. |
|
13 |
+AND |
|
14 |
+reasons the "basic recipe" to account for both features of morality. |
|
15 |
+ |
|
16 |
+ |
|
17 |
+====bad for state of nature==== |
|
18 |
+**NEA 04** |
|
19 |
+~~Nuclear Energy Agency, "Nuclear energy: the role of government," 2004 Vol 22 Num 1~~ |
|
20 |
+Governments have been deeply involved in the development of nuclear energy. Some of them |
|
21 |
+AND |
|
22 |
+action and nuclear energy was a highly visible symbol of their successful application. |