Changes for page Mountain View Paranjpe Neg
Summary
-
Objects (2 modified, 0 added, 10 removed)
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[5]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2016-09-22 20:40:52. 01 +2016-09-22 20:40:52.176
- Caselist.CitesClass[7]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Interpretation: The affirmative must specify a normative ethic in the text of the 1AC. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-01-14 15:32:34.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -all - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -all - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -7 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Mountain View Paranjpe Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Theory Interps - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -cps
- Caselist.CitesClass[9]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,17 +1,0 @@ 1 -Their politics of production will always be utilized to promote regimes of social death and military domination 2 -Occupied UC Berkeley in 2010 (anonymous graduate student in philosophy, “The University, Social Death and the Inside Joke,” http://news.infoshop.org/article.php?story=20100220181610620) 3 -Universities may serve as progressive sites of inquiry in some cases, yet this does 4 -AND 5 -interpretation and every connotation, no longer denoting anyone or anything."56 6 - 7 -The 1AC’s research methodology relies on colonial theories of change that commodify pain in the Academy-turns case. 8 -Tuck and Yang – ’14 – Assistant Professor of Educational Foundations, SUNY New Paltz and Assistant Professor of Ethnic Studies, UC San Diego (Eve Tuck and K. Wayne Yang, “R-Words: Refusing Research,” Humanizing Research, https://faculty.newpaltz.edu/evetuck/files/2013/12/Tuck-and-Yang-R-Words_Refusing-Research.pdf, p. 223-226, MM) language modified 9 -Research is a dirty word among many Native communities (Tuhiwai Smith, 1999), 10 -AND 11 -2010, p. 8) takes the shape of a pain narrative. 12 - 13 -Vote negative to engage in a refusal of their research methodology—questioning their knowledge production is key to solving the aff. 14 -Tuck and Yang – ’14 – Assistant Professor of Educational Foundations, SUNY New Paltz and Assistant Professor of Ethnic Studies, UC San Diego (Eve Tuck and K. Wayne Yang, “R-Words: Refusing Research,” Humanizing Research, https://faculty.newpaltz.edu/evetuck/files/2013/12/Tuck-and-Yang-R-Words_Refusing-Research.pdf, p. 237-242, MM) 15 -Refusal is not just a "no," but a redirection to ideas otherwise unacknowledged 16 -AND 17 -connects our conversation back to desire as a counterlogic to settler colonial knowledge. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-01-15 00:54:44.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Paras Kumar - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -idk - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -9 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Mountain View Paranjpe Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -JF K ~-~- Tuck and Yang - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -HW
- Caselist.CitesClass[11]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,36 +1,0 @@ 1 -The aff allows seditious speech like flag burning 2 -Wrenn 05 3 -From Magic City Morning Star DOUG WRENN Flag Burning: Free Speech Or Sedition? By Doug Wrenn Jul 11, 2005 - 8:32:00 AM 4 -The so-called "Supreme" Court claims that flag burning is free speech 5 -AND 6 -which thus makes it a federal, and not just a state matter. 7 - 8 -their speech act undermines vital military strategy 9 -EYAGO 05 Political Commentary – Sound Politics Reporter 7/8, http://www.soundpolitics.com/archives/004721.html, Sound Commentary on Current Events in Seattle, Puget Sound and Washington State 10 -Finally, I am angry at those who undermine our efforts to conduct this war 11 -AND 12 -our public leaders. What they do for political gain is completely unconscionable. 13 - 14 -Heg solves several scenarios for war and extinction 15 -Bradley A. Thayer, November/December, 2006 “In Defense of Primacy,” NATIONAL INTEREST Issue 86 16 -THROUGHOUT HISTORY, peace and stability have been great benefits of an era where there 17 -AND 18 -, for the United States humanitarian missions are the equivalent of a blitzkrieg. 19 - 20 -Heg solves warming 21 -Cascio ‘8 (Jamais, Writer for the Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies, The Big Picture: Climate Chaos) 22 -The relationship between climate chaos and the rise of the post-hegemonic world is 23 -AND 24 -global capacity to deal with global warming, this is the most dangerous. 25 - 26 -Extinction – several scenarios 27 -Holthaus 14 (Eric Holthaus, meteorologist at Arizona State University and the New America Foundation, citing Navy Adm. David Titley and IPCC studies, 4/21/14, “US military is preparing for ‘climate change war’,” http://bangordailynews.com/2014/04/21/politics/us-military-is-preparing-for-climate-change-war/, Keerthi, Acc 4/21/14) 28 -The U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has just completed a series 29 -AND 30 -. Unfortunately, it’s usually at the last minute, usually under duress. 31 - 32 -Vote neg to align ourselves with hegemony – the academic sphere of debate is key 33 -Mearsheimer 1995 Professor of Political Science and the co-director of the Program on International Security Policy at the University of Chicago. West Point graduate, retired Air Force officer (John, Professor Political Science at the University of Chicago, International Security, Summer, p. 93) 34 -The discussion of institutions up to now has a distinct academic flavor. However, 35 -AND 36 --causing effects of institutions until they have solid evidence to support their positions - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-01-15 22:29:39.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -all - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -all - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -11 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Mountain View Paranjpe Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -JF flag burning - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -cps
- Caselist.CitesClass[12]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,32 +1,0 @@ 1 -To enforce any rights claims at all, the state must have the authority to legislate based on universality-the deontological principle of acting on a universalizable maxim. 2 -Ripstein Bracketed for clarity 3 -All people have the right to act for themselves. Kant argues that provision for 4 -AND 5 -through which laws are made is one that can bind everyone it governs. 6 - 7 -To secure this state authority, we need an objective, impartial observer that represents both parties. You need an omnilateral will. Kant : 8 -When I declare (by word or deed), “I will that an external thing shall be mine,” I thereby declare it obligatory for everyone else to refrain from using the object of my will. This is an obligation that no one would have apart from this juridical act of mine. Included in this claim, however, is an acknowledgment of being and that I’m reciprocally bound to everyone else to a similar and equal restraint with respect to what is theirs. The obligation involved here comes from a universal rule of the external juridical relationship that is, the civil society. Consequently, I am not bound to leave what is another’s property untouched if everyone else does not in turn guarantee to me with regard to what is mine that he will act in accordance with exactly the same principle. This guarantee does not require a special juridical act, but is already contained in the concept of being externally juridically bound to a duty Verpflichtung on account of the universality, and hence also the reciprocity, of an obligation coming from a universal rule. Now, with respect to an external and contingent possession, a unilateral Will cannot serve as a coercive law for everyone, since that would be a violation of freedom in accordance with universal laws. Therefore, only a Will binding everyone else—that is, collective universal (common), and powerful Will—is the kind of Will that can provide the guarantee required. The condition of being subject to general external (that is, public) legislation that is backed by power is the civil society. Accordingly, a thing can be externally yours or mind only in a civil society. 9 - 10 -This outweighs: 11 - 12 -A. Actor-specificity. Even if your framework is true for individuals, it fails for states. There’d be no point of a state if it just permitted infinite rights violations. 13 - 14 -B. Normative force: Even if the AC framework is true, it’s not binding without an omnilateral will to enforce it, so it can’t generate any obligations. 15 - 16 -C. Magnitude. The alternative is infinite rights violations. 17 - 18 -Thus, the standard is consistency with the omnilateral will. 19 - 20 -Seditious speech should be prohibited-it’s inconsistent with state authority 21 -Varden 10 22 -Helga Varden Associate Professor of Philosophy, University of Illinois “A Kantian Conception of Free Speech” Springer. 2010 23 -To understand Kant’s condemnation of seditious speech, remember that Kant, as mentioned above 24 -AND 25 -qua private citizens, it is a public crime (6: 331). 26 - 27 -The aff allows seditious speech like flag burning 28 -Wrenn 05 29 -From Magic City Morning Star DOUG WRENN Flag Burning: Free Speech Or Sedition? By Doug Wrenn Jul 11, 2005 - 8:32:00 AM 30 -The so-called "Supreme" Court claims that flag burning is free speech 31 -AND 32 -which thus makes it a federal, and not just a state matter. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-01-15 22:30:41.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Chris Castillo - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Santa Monica RE - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -12 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -5 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Mountain View Paranjpe Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -JF NC ~-~- Omni - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -HW
- Caselist.CitesClass[13]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,16 +1,0 @@ 1 -Morality must be agent-neutral to explain the universality of moral claims—but moral claims must also appeal to subjective features of moral agents to explain their normativity 2 -Lerm 1 summarizes 3 -Lerm, Jessica. “Second-personal reasons: why we need something like them, but why there are actually no such things,” South African Journal of Philosophy31.2 (2012): 328-339. Note: the author disagrees with the conclusion of the NC. 4 -Agent-neutral reasons are to be distinguished from agent-relative reasons,2 5 -AND 6 -possible solutions to the puzzle: Hobbes', and the neo-Kantians'. 7 - 8 - 9 -That implies that the giving up of absolute authority to the state—only Hobbesian contract theory generates normative universal reasons for state action 10 -Lerm 2 summarizes 11 -Lerm, Jessica. “Second-personal reasons: why we need something like them, but why there are actually no such things,” South African Journal of Philosophy31.2 (2012): 328-339. Note: the author disagrees with the conclusion of the NC. 12 -The Hobbesian proposal Thomas Hobbes offers a solution to this puzzle of moral reasons. 13 -AND 14 -reasons the "basic recipe" to account for both features of morality. 15 - 16 -They allow seditious speech- - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-01-16 21:22:19.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -all - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -all - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -13 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -3 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Mountain View Paranjpe Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -JF NC ~-~- hobbes - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -cps
- Caselist.RoundClass[5]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -5
- Caselist.RoundClass[7]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -7 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-01-14 15:32:32.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -all - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -all - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -cps
- Caselist.RoundClass[9]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -9 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-01-15 00:54:42.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Paras Kumar - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -idk - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -HW
- Caselist.RoundClass[11]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -11 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-01-15 22:29:36.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -all - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -all - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -cps
- Caselist.RoundClass[12]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -12 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-01-15 22:30:39.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Chris Castillo - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Santa Monica RE - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -5 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -HW
- Caselist.RoundClass[13]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -13 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-01-16 21:22:16.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -all - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -all - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -3 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -cps