Changes for page Mountain View Paranjpe Neg
Summary
-
Objects (2 modified, 0 added, 7 removed)
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[5]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2016-09-22 20:40:52. 01 +2016-09-22 20:40:52.176
- Caselist.CitesClass[7]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Interpretation: The affirmative must specify a normative ethic in the text of the 1AC. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-01-14 15:32:34.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -all - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -all - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -7 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Mountain View Paranjpe Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Theory Interps - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -cps
- Caselist.CitesClass[9]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,17 +1,0 @@ 1 -Their politics of production will always be utilized to promote regimes of social death and military domination 2 -Occupied UC Berkeley in 2010 (anonymous graduate student in philosophy, “The University, Social Death and the Inside Joke,” http://news.infoshop.org/article.php?story=20100220181610620) 3 -Universities may serve as progressive sites of inquiry in some cases, yet this does 4 -AND 5 -interpretation and every connotation, no longer denoting anyone or anything."56 6 - 7 -The 1AC’s research methodology relies on colonial theories of change that commodify pain in the Academy-turns case. 8 -Tuck and Yang – ’14 – Assistant Professor of Educational Foundations, SUNY New Paltz and Assistant Professor of Ethnic Studies, UC San Diego (Eve Tuck and K. Wayne Yang, “R-Words: Refusing Research,” Humanizing Research, https://faculty.newpaltz.edu/evetuck/files/2013/12/Tuck-and-Yang-R-Words_Refusing-Research.pdf, p. 223-226, MM) language modified 9 -Research is a dirty word among many Native communities (Tuhiwai Smith, 1999), 10 -AND 11 -2010, p. 8) takes the shape of a pain narrative. 12 - 13 -Vote negative to engage in a refusal of their research methodology—questioning their knowledge production is key to solving the aff. 14 -Tuck and Yang – ’14 – Assistant Professor of Educational Foundations, SUNY New Paltz and Assistant Professor of Ethnic Studies, UC San Diego (Eve Tuck and K. Wayne Yang, “R-Words: Refusing Research,” Humanizing Research, https://faculty.newpaltz.edu/evetuck/files/2013/12/Tuck-and-Yang-R-Words_Refusing-Research.pdf, p. 237-242, MM) 15 -Refusal is not just a "no," but a redirection to ideas otherwise unacknowledged 16 -AND 17 -connects our conversation back to desire as a counterlogic to settler colonial knowledge. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-01-15 00:54:44.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Paras Kumar - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -idk - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -9 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Mountain View Paranjpe Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -JF K ~-~- Tuck and Yang - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -HW
- Caselist.CitesClass[10]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,21 +1,0 @@ 1 -Morality must be agent-neutral to explain the universality of moral claims—but moral clsims must also appeal to subjective features of moral agents to explain their normativity 2 -Lerm 1 summarizes 3 -Lerm, Jessica. “Second-personal reasons: why we need something like them, but why there are actually no such things,” South African Journal of Philosophy31.2 (2012): 328-339. Note: the author disagrees with the conclusion of the NC. 4 -Agent-neutral reasons are to be distinguished from agent-relative reasons,2 5 -AND 6 -possible solutions to the puzzle: Hobbes', and the neo-Kantians'. 7 - 8 -Impacts: 9 - 10 -A). takes out theories like util—they assume some moral good to be maximized, but the good only exists for a particular agent 11 - 12 -B). authority and universality are a side constraint to any ethical theory—or else they can’t generate normative obligations for state action since states won’t follow them 13 - 14 -That implies that the giving up of absolute authority to the state—only Hobbesian contract theory generates normative universal reasons for state action 15 -Lerm 2 summarizes 16 -Lerm, Jessica. “Second-personal reasons: why we need something like them, but why there are actually no such things,” South African Journal of Philosophy31.2 (2012): 328-339. Note: the author disagrees with the conclusion of the NC. 17 -The Hobbesian proposal Thomas Hobbes offers a solution to this puzzle of moral reasons. 18 -AND 19 -reasons the "basic recipe" to account for both features of morality. 20 - 21 -They allow seditious speech- - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-01-15 22:29:08.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -all - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -all - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -10 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -3 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Mountain View Paranjpe Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -JF NC ~-~- hobbes - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -cps
- Caselist.RoundClass[5]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -5
- Caselist.RoundClass[7]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -7 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-01-14 15:32:32.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -all - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -all - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -cps
- Caselist.RoundClass[9]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -9 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-01-15 00:54:42.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Paras Kumar - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -idk - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -HW
- Caselist.RoundClass[10]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -10 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-01-15 22:29:05.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -all - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -all - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -3 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -cps
- Caselist.RoundClass[11]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-01-15 22:29:36.612 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -all - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -all - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -cps