Summary

• Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[1]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[1]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,46 +1,0 @@
1		-T about what the “correct” way to interpret English from a grammatical or linguistic standpoint constructs an impartial and “rational” reading of the resolution which excludes marginalized voices and presumes that the dominant way of speaking is truth.
2		-Rebar Niemi, 9/22/15, Mr. Nebel’s neighborhood, OR Nebel Tea – I sip it. http://premierdebatetoday.com/2015/09/22/nebel-t-i-sip-it/
3		-No more neighborhood...correct resolutional meaning.
4		-
5		-Even if T is not based on semantics, forcing debaters to always debate the topic still constrains advocacy by relegating what issues are “important”
6		-In Defense of Inclusion by John Scoggin and Bob Overing September 10, 2015
7		-Nebel also argues...of truth-testing.
8		-
9		-Using T to limit jurisdiction:
10		-1. abstracts away from reality of oppression
11		-2. devalues and otherizes non-traditional debate styles
12		-3. discourages diversity by enforcing a narrow interpretation of what debate should look like
13		-In Defense of Inclusion by John Scoggin and Bob Overing September 10, 2015
14		-If we can...to take seriously.
15		-
16		-The process of Topic selection reinforces the perspective of the dominant ideology. For example, the active voice of the topic outsources agency to governmental bodies that has been historical denied to minorities.
17		-12-2014 Against the grain : the challenges of black discourse within intercollegiate policy debate. Tiffany Yvonne Dillard-Knox University of Louisville
18		-On face, this...exclusion from Debate.
19		-
20		-Thus the advocacy:
21		-Public colleges and universities ought to prohibit topicality as a restriction on minorities engaging in performance debate in college policy debate.
22		-
23		-Go Homers, Makeovers or Takeovers? A Privilege Analysis of Debate as a Gaming Simulation
24		-Ede Warner, Jr, PhD in Communications, 2003, “Go Homers, Makeovers or Takeovers? A Privilege Analysis of Debate as a Gaming Simulation,” Contemporary Argumentation and Debate
25		-A more effective...equal playing field.
26		-
27		-Instead of being faced with the choice of forced assimilation, Non-traditional debate styles allow black debaters to combine their cultural identity with the format and perspective of debate.
28		-
29		-12-2014 Against the grain : the challenges of black discourse within intercollegiate policy debate. Tiffany Yvonne Dillard-Knox University of Louisville
30		-Shelton K. Hill...while doing so.
31		-
32		-Participation in policy discussions re-entrenches inequalities by accepting and legitimizing structural constraints. Critiquing policy from the outside is a better activist strategy.
33		-Young — Iris Marion Young, Professor of Political Science at the University of Chicago, holds a Ph.D. in Philosophy from the Pennsylvania State University, 2001 (“Activist Challenges to Deliberative Democracy,” Political Theory, Volume 29, Number 5, October, Available Online to Subscribing Institutions via JSTOR, p. 682-685)
34		-Let us suppose...give some examples.
35		-
36		-Criticism and real world advocacy is key to reclaiming agency from the state to us as debaters.
37		-Polson 12 (Dana Roe Polson, PhD in Language Literacy and Culture, UMBC, Baltimore city public and public charter schools high school teacher, “’Longing for Theory:’ Performance Debate in Action” Dissertain directed by Dr. Christine Mallinson, Assistant Professor, Language, Literacy, and Culture pp. 256-257)CEFS
38		-One of the...to do something.
39		-
40		-The ROTB is to challenge norms and procedures of traditional debate to challenge oppression in the debate community.
41		-To weigh links, we see which model of debate and topicality best controls the internal link to inclusion.
42		-Dillard-Knox, Tiffany Yvonne, "Against the grain : the challenges of black discourse within intercollegiate policy debate." (2014). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 2161. http://dx.doi.org/10.18297/etd/2161
43		-
44		-Underview
45		-Cross-x checks for theory/T:
46		-If debaters are given the opportunity to resolve fairness questions, then there is less frivolous theory. Frivolous theory is bad because it’s often more abusive than the abuse it claims to solve, and so recycled it’s not educational

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2016-12-18 01:03:09.0

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Any

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Any

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-3

Round

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2

Team

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Monta Vista Huang Aff

Title

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Topicality AC

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-CPS