| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,27 @@ |
|
1 |
+A. Interpretation- The aff must not specify that insert actor ought to prohibit the production of nuclear power. |
|
2 |
+ |
|
3 |
+B. Violation |
|
4 |
+ |
|
5 |
+C. Standards |
|
6 |
+ |
|
7 |
+1. Precision- Bare plurals such as “countries” or “autonomous medical choices” aren’t about any specific within the set-exceptions can’t prove the rule. Damerdji summarizes Nebel in 15: |
|
8 |
+Salim Damerdji. September 27, 2015. Comment on PDT article: Nebel T- I Sip it. http://premierdebatetoday.com/2015/09/22/nebel-t-i-sip-it/comment-page-1/#comment-3164 |
|
9 |
+I agree that it’s dubious to deem one vernacular as “correct” among a |
|
10 |
+AND |
|
11 |
+more to the point, standards for logical inferences can’t be categorically oppressive. |
|
12 |
+ |
|
13 |
+ “Countries” is a bare plural, which refers to generics. Leslie : |
|
14 |
+ Generics To appear in The Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy Sarah-Jane Leslie Penultimate Draft: Please cite final version only https://www.princeton.edu/~sjleslie/RoutledgeEncyclopediaEntry2.pdf Professor Department of Philosophy Affiliated Faculty Department of Psychology Executive Committee Program in Linguistics |
|
15 |
+Generics are statements such as “dogs are mammals”, “a tiger is striped |
|
16 |
+AND |
|
17 |
+” are classified generics, but we will not follow this practice here.) |
|
18 |
+ |
|
19 |
+2. Limits- |
|
20 |
+ |
|
21 |
+Fairness outweighs the K |
|
22 |
+ |
|
23 |
+Drop the Debater |
|
24 |
+ |
|
25 |
+Competing Interps |
|
26 |
+ |
|
27 |
+RVI’s BAD |