| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,15 @@ |
|
1 |
+QI is a question of whether the fact that someone is a police officer, in contrast to the ordinary citizen, should have greater independence with their actions. Mukherji: |
|
2 |
+Mukherji, Aditi. "What Is Qualified Immunity?" Injured. N.p., 17 Apr. 2013. Web. |
|
3 |
+Qualified immunity shields… of constitutional violations. |
|
4 |
+ |
|
5 |
+Only agents are intrinsically valuable since facts about the world only have value relative to agents. Hill: |
|
6 |
+Thomas Hill, Jr. “Self-regarding suicide: A modified Kantian view,” in Autonomy and Self-Respect, Cambridge University Press, 1991, 102-103. |
|
7 |
+The second argument… their own sakes. |
|
8 |
+ |
|
9 |
+Inductive reasoning fails, so reject distinctions contingent on states of affairs and predictive calculations. Hume: |
|
10 |
+Hume, David. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, http://18th.eserver.org/hume-enquiry.html#4 |
|
11 |
+That there are… point in question. |
|
12 |
+ |
|
13 |
+Because QI is essentially a legal distinction, the negative must show that the legal distinction grounds a morally relevant difference. However, appeals to legal distinctions by themselves are not morally relevant. Schapiro: |
|
14 |
+Shapiro, Scott J. Authority (2000). Stanford/Yale Jr. Faculty Forum Research Paper 00-05; Cardozo Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 24. SSRN. http://ssrn.com/abstract=233830 or doi:10.2139/ssrn.233830 |
|
15 |
+It is sometimes… on undefeated reasons. |