| ... |
... |
@@ -1,22
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-====Discourse as a fuel for change is a neoliberal myth – it obscures the historical need for direct action.==== |
| 2 |
|
-Andrew **Tillett-Saks,** 20**13** |
| 3 |
|
-Tillett-Saks is a labor organizer and critical activist author for Truth-Out and Counterpunch. "Neoliberal Myths" Counterpunch. http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/11/07/neoliberal-myths/ |
| 4 |
|
-In the wake of the Brown University shout-down of Ray Kelly, champion |
| 5 |
|
-AND |
| 6 |
|
-greater freedom. To the contrary, direct action has always proved necessary. |
| 7 |
|
- |
| 8 |
|
- |
| 9 |
|
-====Absolute free speech comes at the cost of excluding marginalized groups on campuses – making tradeoffs with free speech is crucial to ensure the inclusion of minority students.==== |
| 10 |
|
-Reed E. **McConnell,** 20**12** |
| 11 |
|
-"Why Harvard's Hate Speech Policies Are Necessary" http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2012/4/18/hate-speech-libertarians/ |
| 12 |
|
-There certainly should be dialogue around issues of racism, sexism, homophobia, and |
| 13 |
|
-AND |
| 14 |
|
-well thought-out and fair—and certainly not worthy of protest. |
| 15 |
|
- |
| 16 |
|
- |
| 17 |
|
-====Idealistic understandings of deliberative democracy are incoherent and inherently paradoxical. Democracy mandates exclusion through formulating consensus that makes true free speech impossible and recreates arbitrary structures of power. ==== |
| 18 |
|
-Chantal **Mouffe,** 19**97** |
| 19 |
|
-"Carl Schmitt and the Paradox of Liberal Democracy" |
| 20 |
|
-Let us examine this model of deliberative democracy closely. In their attempt to ground |
| 21 |
|
-AND |
| 22 |
|
-people by reducing it to one of its many possible forms of identification. |