Summary

• Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[2]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[2]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,76 +1,0 @@
1		-==Interpretation and Violation==
2		-
3		-
4		-====The affirmative should defend the desirability of countries prohibiting the production of nuclear power. ====
5		-
6		-
7		-====This does not require a specific form but only isolates what the content of the affirmative should contain – the affirmative must defend a policy action but can perform or present such an advocacy in any way they so desire.====
8		-
9		-
10		-==== 'Resolved' denotes a proposal to be enacted by law ====
11		-**Words and Phrases 64** (Permanent Edition)
12		-Definition of the word "resolve," given by Webster is "to express an
13		-AND
14		-," which is defined by Bouvier as meaning "to establish by law".
15		-
16		-
17		-==== 'Prohibit' is a verb meaning to formally forbid by law====
18		-**Google Dictionary,** 20**16**
19		-"Prohibit"
20		-pro·hib·it
21		-prəˈhibit,prōˈhibit/Submit
22		-verb
23		-verb
24		-AND
25		-a cash shortage prohibited the visit"
26		-antonyms: facilitate, allow
27		-
28		-
29		-===Limits===
30		-
31		-
32		-====Limits – they explode the potential affirmatives which structurally favors the affirmative because they can prep out specific responses while permuting counterplans and alternatives – screws the neg through massive prep skews and ability to engage. ====
33		-
34		-
35		-===Agonistic Constraints===
36		-
37		-
38		-====Substantive constraints on the debate are key to actualize effective pluralism and agonistic democracy====
39		-John** Dryzek 6**, Professor of Social and Political Theory, The Australian National University, Reconciling Pluralism and Consensus as Political Ideals, American Journal of Political Science,Vol. 50, No. 3, July 2006, Pp. 634–649
40		-A more radical contemporary pluralism is suspicious of liberal and communitarian devices for reconciling difference
41		-AND
42		-need principles to regulate the substance of what rightfully belongs in democratic debate.
43		-
44		-
45		-====Debate inevitably involves exclusions—making sure that those exclusions occur along reciprocal lines is necessary to foster democratic habits. This process outweighs the content of the aff====
46		-Amanda **ANDERSON '6**, Andrew W. Mellon Professor for the Humanities at Brown University, 6 ~~The Way We Argue Now, Princeton University Press, p. 25-28~~
47		-Whether such a procedural approach actually helps to yield any substantive normative guidance is an
48		-AND
49		-by the principles of recognition and respect that underpin democratic institutions and practices.
50		-
51		-
52		-===Competitive Equity/Fairness===
53		-
54		-
55		-====The role of the ballot is to vote for who provides the best methodology for upholding competitive equity. ====
56		-
57		-
58		-====Fairness and likewise competitive equity are voting issues – topical fairness requirements are key to meaningful dialogue—monopolizing strategy and prep makes the discussion one-sided and subverts any meaningful neg role====
59		-Ryan** Galloway 7**, Samford Comm prof, Contemporary Argumentation and Debate, Vol. 28, 2007
60		-Debate as a dialogue sets an argumentative table, where all parties receive a relatively
61		-AND
62		-substitutes for topical action do not accrue the dialogical benefits of topical advocacy.
63		-
64		-
65		-====Evaluate the T debate under competing interpretations – it's key to generate clear models of debate and ground because otherwise the aff's interpretation can be a moving target. Reasonability is arbitrarily defined and causes a race to the bottom for the "most reasonable" position. ====
66		-
67		-
68		-===Starting Points Good – Viscosity ===
69		-
70		-
71		-====Minoritarian thought requires protocols of experimentation – a particular style and starting point for which to begin becoming.====
72		-Ronald **Bogue,** 20**11**
73		-Bogue is a Professor Emeritus at Franklin College, University of Georgia. "Deleuze and Guattari and the Future of Politics: Science Fiction, Protocols and the People to Come" Deleuze Studies, Volume 5, Issue Supplement, Edinburgh University Press, pg 77-97
74		-Fabulation does not presume an ideal, nor does it have an external goal as
75		-AND
76		-as revolutionary action and passion' (Deleuze and Guattari 1983: 63).3

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2016-09-23 15:39:29.0

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Pilcher, Smith

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Lake Highland AA

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-3

Round

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2

Team

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Millard North Brown Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-0 - Procedural - Framework

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Valley RR