| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,39 @@ |
|
1 |
+====Western liberal notions of constitutive freedom are tools used to "civilize" populations in order to "advance" – that limits the category of human and excludes those rendered as lacking ability. ==== |
|
2 |
+Fiona Kumari **Campbell,** 20**05** |
|
3 |
+Campbell is a Senior Lecturer in Disability Studies at the School of Human Services and Social Work Griffith University (Brisbane) and Adjunct Professor in Disability Studies, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya, Sri Lanka. "Legislating Disability: Negative Ontologies and the Government of Legal Identities" in "Foucault and Government of Disability" edited by Shelley Termain, University of Michigan Press, Pg 110-114 |
|
4 |
+Within contemporary Western, neoliberal societies, freedom is held to be an inalienable and |
|
5 |
+AND |
|
6 |
+of relations of exchangebetween proprietors.(Macpherson 1964, 3; emphasis added) |
|
7 |
+ |
|
8 |
+ |
|
9 |
+====Legal structures are predicated on a negative ontology of disability constructed around a lack. The very foundation of Western jurisprudence requires the subjection of debility in order to perfect ability – commodifying subjects into units of use-value while enacting psychic violence on those who strive for an ideal they by definition can never achieve. ==== |
|
10 |
+Fiona Kumari **Campbell,** 20**05** |
|
11 |
+Campbell is a Senior Lecturer in Disability Studies at the School of Human Services and Social Work Griffith University (Brisbane) and Adjunct Professor in Disability Studies, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya, Sri Lanka. "Legislating Disability: Negative Ontologies and the Government of Legal Identities" in "Foucault and Government of Disability" edited by Shelley Termain, University of Michigan Press, Pg 118-120 |
|
12 |
+With respect to disability, it would seem that such "legal actions" give |
|
13 |
+AND |
|
14 |
+the introduction of the legal category of voluntary/elective/chosen disability. |
|
15 |
+ |
|
16 |
+ |
|
17 |
+===Crip Killjoy=== |
|
18 |
+ |
|
19 |
+ |
|
20 |
+====Vote negative to embrace the Crip Killjoy - a refusal to play according to able-bodied logic. Instead, we embrace the wild extravagancy within the instability of the disabled – a crip willingness to release cruelly optimistic fantasies in favor of the reality of crip-life. Killing joy operates as both an internal personal catharsis and an external deployable strategy – deconstructing cultural institutions while carving spaces of possibility which resist forces of self-deprivation. ==== |
|
21 |
+Merri Lisa **Johnson and** Robert **McRuer,** 20**14** |
|
22 |
+"Cripistemologies: Introduction", Journal of Literary and Cultural Disability Studies, Volume 8, Issue 2, (Article) Pg 135-137. |
|
23 |
+In "Prognosis Time," Puar describes an interdependent relationship between the neoliberal consumer subject |
|
24 |
+AND |
|
25 |
+the sharpness of this "cannot") opens up a world of possibility. |
|
26 |
+ |
|
27 |
+ |
|
28 |
+===Composition=== |
|
29 |
+ |
|
30 |
+ |
|
31 |
+====The role of the ballot is to vote for the best methodology of composition. ==== |
|
32 |
+ |
|
33 |
+ |
|
34 |
+====Composition is not only an act of writing, but a process that demands particular bodies within the classroom. Pedagogy should style itself towards isolating moments of queerness/disability and proliferating them to resist ideal notions of being. This process of decomposition refuses static finality and instead enables pathways for alternative forms of existence. ==== |
|
35 |
+Robert **McRuer,** 20**06** |
|
36 |
+"Composing Queerness and Disability: The Corporate University and Alternative Corporealities" In "Crip Theory: Cultural Signs of Queerness and Disability" New York University Press, pg 157-159. |
|
37 |
+In some very important ways, we are in fact not all queer/disabled |
|
38 |
+AND |
|
39 |
+and away from the finished product is that disability and queerness are desirable. |