Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[39]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[55]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[39]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2016-12-17 14:51:00.746
	1	+2016-12-17 14:51:00.0

Caselist.CitesClass[55]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,30 @@
	1	+====Interpretation and Violation: The affirmative may not read a premise that states that agents of the United States government ought follow the U.S. Constitution and read a burden structure that is distinct from comparative worlds or truth-testing. ====
	2	+
	3	+
	4	+====They did that====
	5	+
	6	+
	7	+====Ground – their standard makes all negative ground impossible because constitutionality auto-affirms by the nature of the topic being about limiting constitutionally protected speech. That makes negative engagement impossible ex-post-facto and in combination with their burden structure takes out all topical disadvantages, counterplan, kritiks, and even most topic NCs. Ground is key to fairness it controls my ability to engage====
	8	+
	9	+
	10	+====Predictability – they can pick any burden they want out of a multidude of philosophical theories. I come into the debate unprepared and it makes it impossible to engage the affirmative. Predictability key to fairness====
	11	+
	12	+
	13	+====Vote neg====
	14	+====Fairness is a voting issue====
	15	+
	16	+
	17	+
	18	+====Drop the debater – ====
	19	+
	20	+
	21	+
	22	+
	23	+
	24	+
	25	+====No RVI —- ====
	26	+
	27	+
	28	+
	29	+
	30	+====Use competing interpretations –====

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2016-12-17 14:51:03.155

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Nick Smith

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Valley EM

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+39

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+5

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Millard North Brown Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+3 - T - Constitutionalism and Burden Bad

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Blake