| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,19 @@ |
|
1 |
+====Interpretation and Violation: ==== |
|
2 |
+ |
|
3 |
+ |
|
4 |
+====Corrections officers are distinct from police – they're not topical. ==== |
|
5 |
+Jeff **Roberts,** 20**13** |
|
6 |
+"Patrol Officer vs. Sheriff's Deputy vs. Correctional Officer: Which Entry-Level Law Enforcement Job is Right for You?" |
|
7 |
+Correctional officers vs. patrol officers and sheriff's deputies |
|
8 |
+Correctional officers – often referred |
|
9 |
+AND |
|
10 |
+another 26,000 expected to be available by 2020 (see chart). |
|
11 |
+ |
|
12 |
+ |
|
13 |
+====Vote negative —-==== |
|
14 |
+ |
|
15 |
+ |
|
16 |
+====Limits – they explode limits by opening the topic to any government officials – that can include correction officers, district attornies, the military, and otherwise. That generates distinct literature bases that are completely distinct from police – prisons are different than the general population, military is distinct from civilian – which makes neg prep burdens incredibly high. Limits key to fairness because it controls our ability to engage.==== |
|
17 |
+ |
|
18 |
+ |
|
19 |
+====Ground – we can't go for our compstat counterplan, court clog, or police insurance disadvantages, police related kritiks, or topic counterplans we had prepped for outrounds because they don't defend police officers which our links are contingent on. Ground is key to fairness because it demarcates our ability to engage.==== |