Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[34]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[48]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[34]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2016-11-21 01:12:55.673
	1	+2016-11-21 01:12:55.0

Caselist.CitesClass[48]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,30 @@
	1	+====Legal structures are predicated on a negative ontology of disability constructed around a lack. The very foundation of Western jurisprudence requires the subjection of debility in order to perfect ability – commodifying subjects into units of use-value while enacting psychic violence on those who strive for an ideal they by definition can never achieve. ====
	2	+Fiona Kumari **Campbell,** 20**05**
	3	+Campbell is a Senior Lecturer in Disability Studies at the School of Human Services and Social Work Griffith University (Brisbane) and Adjunct Professor in Disability Studies, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya, Sri Lanka. "Legislating Disability: Negative Ontologies and the Government of Legal Identities" in "Foucault and Government of Disability" edited by Shelley Termain, University of Michigan Press, Pg 118-120
	4	+With respect to disability, it would seem that such "legal actions" give
	5	+AND
	6	+the introduction of the legal category of voluntary/elective/chosen disability.
	7	+
	8	+
	9	+====The prison industrial complex is sustained by the psychiatric management of deviant bodies – the mentally ill, physically disabled, and disposable. Analysis focused on merely racialized or gender-based violence obfuscates the ideological neoliberal ordering of the penal system around the signifier of "madness" and the medicalization of difference.====
	10	+Michael **Rembis,** 20**14**
	11	+"The New Asylums: Madness and Mass Incarceration in the Neoliberal Era" in "Disability Incarcerated Imprisonment and Disability in the United States and Canada"
	12	+In a revealing article in the December 2010 issue of the Journal of American History
	13	+AND
	14	+(Foucault and Senellart 2008; Harvey 2005; Phillips-Fein 2009).
	15	+
	16	+
	17	+====Propagation of violence is demarcated along lines of disqualification – the rendering of certain aesthetic characteristics as inferior and incapable of progress. These underpinnings of socially constructed disability is the master signifier that enables socially-constructed characteristics to justify disposability.====
	18	+Tobin **Siebers,** 20**09**
	19	+Siebers is a Professor of Literary and Cultural Criticism at the University of Michigan. "The Aesthetics of Human Disqualification", Lecture.
	20	+Oppression is the systematic victimization of one group by another. It is a form
	21	+AND
	22	+represents at this moment in time the final frontier of justifiable human inferiority.
	23	+
	24	+
	25	+====Vote negative to embrace the Crip Killjoy - a refusal to play according to able-bodied logic. Instead, we embrace the wild extravagancy within the instability of the disabled – a crip willingness to release cruelly optimistic fantasies in favor of the reality of crip-life. Killing joy operates as both an internal personal catharsis and an external deployable strategy – deconstructing cultural institutions while carving spaces of possibility which resist forces of self-deprivation. ====
	26	+Merri Lisa **Johnson and** Robert **McRuer,** 20**14**
	27	+"Cripistemologies: Introduction", Journal of Literary and Cultural Disability Studies, Volume 8, Issue 2, (Article) Pg 135-137.
	28	+In "Prognosis Time," Puar describes an interdependent relationship between the neoliberal consumer subject
	29	+AND
	30	+the sharpness of this "cannot") opens up a world of possibility.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2016-11-21 01:12:57.314

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Panel

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Immaculate Heart DD

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+34

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Doubles

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Millard North Brown Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2 - K - Ableist Incarceration

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+The Glenbrooks