| ... |
... |
@@ -1,94
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-==1AC== |
| 2 |
|
- |
| 3 |
|
- |
| 4 |
|
-===Framework=== |
| 5 |
|
- |
| 6 |
|
- |
| 7 |
|
-====The standard is minimizing harm to vulnerable populations. ==== |
| 8 |
|
- |
| 9 |
|
- |
| 10 |
|
-====We'll defend the standard primarily as a filter for impacts post hypothetical enactment of the affirmative. However, if the negative introduces a role of the judge/ballot we will defend the standard as a method of ethics which the judge ought to embrace and the debate ought to be based within – that just means we get to weigh the aff framework against potential 1NC pre-fiat frameworks. ==== |
| 11 |
|
- |
| 12 |
|
- |
| 13 |
|
-====Decision-making cannot be entirely objective – social ideologies render certain populations as disposable and manage risk unevenly. ==== |
| 14 |
|
-Elizabeth A. **Povinelli,** 20**13** |
| 15 |
|
-Povinelli is Franz Boas Professor of Anthropology and Gender Studies, Director of the Institute for Research on Women and Gender and the Co-Director of the Centre for the Study of Law and Culture at Columbia University. "Necropolitics"; The Anthropology of Biopolitics; February 23, 2013; https://anthrobiopolitics.wordpress.com/2013/02/23/necropolitics/" |
| 16 |
|
-In what might be seen as biopolitical 'social disposability' rather than 'social death' |
| 17 |
|
-AND |
| 18 |
|
-. government was reducing its populace to a politics of "bare life". |
| 19 |
|
- |
| 20 |
|
- |
| 21 |
|
-====Ethical calculi are not neutral – privileged lives always matter more than the underprivileged because of mechanisms of power – you should forefront combating cognitive biases. ==== |
| 22 |
|
-Walter **Mignolo,** 20**07** |
| 23 |
|
-Mingnolo is an Argentinian semiotician and professor at Duke. "The De-Colonial Option and the Meaning of Identity in Politics" |
| 24 |
|
-The rhetoric of modernity (from the Christian mission since the sixteenth century, to |
| 25 |
|
-AND |
| 26 |
|
-of human lives; that is, according to a racist classification.5 |
| 27 |
|
- |
| 28 |
|
- |
| 29 |
|
-====High magnitude scenario planning results in compassion fatigue – overexposure to crisis exhausts society's political mobility for collective problem solving in favor of individual security and artificially magnifies perceptual likelihood of low probability events.==== |
| 30 |
|
-Timothy **Recuber,** 20**11** |
| 31 |
|
-Recuber is a doctoral candidate in sociology at the Graduate Center of the City University of New York, he has taught at Hunter College in Manhattan. "CONSUMING CATASTROPHE: AUTHENTICITY AND EMOTION IN MASS-MEDIATED DISASTER" gradworks.umi.com/3477831.pdf |
| 32 |
|
-The emotional component of disaster consumption is therefore an important part of these processes. |
| 33 |
|
-AND |
| 34 |
|
-preventative consumption may constitute the only preventative measures being taken on one's behalf. |
| 35 |
|
- |
| 36 |
|
- |
| 37 |
|
-===Advantage 1 is Illegal Surveillance=== |
| 38 |
|
- |
| 39 |
|
- |
| 40 |
|
-====Local police departments engage in massive illegal wiretapping operations – Riverside County alone enacted 20 of the nation's wiretap warrants and intercepted information from more than 52,000 people causing hundreds of arrests and seizing millions of dollars nationwide. ==== |
| 41 |
|
-Tim **Cushing,** 20**15** |
| 42 |
|
-"California Police Used Illegal Wiretap Warrants In Hundreds Of Drug Prosecutions" https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20151121/06351232876/california-police-used-illegal-wiretap-warrants-hundreds-drug-prosecutions.shtml |
| 43 |
|
-So, a federal agency has already been exposed as participating in likely illegal activity |
| 44 |
|
-AND |
| 45 |
|
-trouble determining whether this apparently illegal surveillance helped build a case against them. |
| 46 |
|
- |
| 47 |
|
- |
| 48 |
|
-====Wiretapping is not neutral – surveillance is increasingly racialized and targeted at people of color – it is a system of overt racism and brings the constant worry of "am I being watched"? ==== |
| 49 |
|
-Alvaro M. **Bedoya, 01/18/**16 |
| 50 |
|
-Executive Director of the Center on Privacy and Technology and Adjunct Professor of Law at Georgetown Law. "The Color of Surveillance", http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/future_tense/2016/01/what_the_fbi_s_surveillance_of_martin_luther_king_says_about_modern_spying.html |
| 51 |
|
-There is a myth in this country that in a world where everyone is watched |
| 52 |
|
-AND |
| 53 |
|
-was watching—and listening—waiting for them to make a mistake. |
| 54 |
|
- |
| 55 |
|
- |
| 56 |
|
-===Plan=== |
| 57 |
|
- |
| 58 |
|
- |
| 59 |
|
-====Thus the plan: The United States Federal Government will issue a statutory enactment which precludes qualified immunity from being used as a defense by police officers in suits regarding the Federal Wiretap Act. ==== |
| 60 |
|
- |
| 61 |
|
- |
| 62 |
|
-===Solvency=== |
| 63 |
|
- |
| 64 |
|
- |
| 65 |
|
-====First - qualified immunity kills the effectiveness of the Federal Wiretapping Act – it lets officers get away with civil rights abuses that the statue was built to punish. ==== |
| 66 |
|
-Kathleen **Lockard,** 20**01** |
| 67 |
|
-"Qualified Immunity as a Defense to Federal Wiretap Act Claims" The University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 68, No. 4, pg 1393-1395 |
| 68 |
|
-While, in general, statutes are interpreted to preserve common law meanings and doctrines |
| 69 |
|
-AND |
| 70 |
|
-authorization. This means that the defendant will not be left without protection. |
| 71 |
|
- |
| 72 |
|
- |
| 73 |
|
-====Second - only Congressional action can set a standard on qualified immunity that enables the courts to act – the plan is key. ==== |
| 74 |
|
-Kathleen **Lockard,** 20**01** |
| 75 |
|
-"Qualified Immunity as a Defense to Federal Wiretap Act Claims" The University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 68, No. 4, pg 1371-1377. |
| 76 |
|
-Qualified immunity is a federal common law defense that may be precluded by statute. |
| 77 |
|
-AND |
| 78 |
|
-paramount, even when deciding if qualified immunity is available under a statute. |
| 79 |
|
- |
| 80 |
|
- |
| 81 |
|
-====Court precedent is that qualified immunity can be used as a defense against the FWA – it includes both statutory and constitutional claims. ==== |
| 82 |
|
-Paul Michael **Brown,** 20**10** |
| 83 |
|
-"Personal Liability Tort Litigation Against Federal Employees" The United States Attorneys' Bulletin, November 2010, Vol. 58, No. 6 https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/usao/legacy/2010/12/06/usab5806.pdf |
| 84 |
|
-The Supreme Court has long recognized that qualified immunity is available to counter not only |
| 85 |
|
-AND |
| 86 |
|
-as a defense to a plaintiff's statutory claims under the Federal Wiretap Act). |
| 87 |
|
- |
| 88 |
|
- |
| 89 |
|
-====Detailed discussions of governmental policy regarding crime is crucial to democratic change – it holds policy-makers accountable, informs citizens, and enables reforms to have influence in institutional settings. ==== |
| 90 |
|
-Vanessa **Barker,** 20**09** |
| 91 |
|
-Barker is an Assistant Professor of Criminology at Florida State University. "The Politics of Imprisonment How the Democratic Process Shapes the Way America Punishes Offenders,"pp 182-188 |
| 92 |
|
-This study has some important and potentially unpopular policy implications. First, I think |
| 93 |
|
-AND |
| 94 |
|
-in American public life, as it could be with American penal sanctioning. |