Summary

• Objects (0 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[7]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[7]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,55 @@
	1	+Libertarianism NC
	2	+I negate.
	3	+
	4	+I value morality due to the word ought in the resolution, necessitating a debate over moral obligations.
	5	+
	6	+My standard will be following the principles of libertarianism including non-interference which argues that the government should never interfere in the affairs of people except to eliminate people’s aggression between each other and property which argues that the government doesn’t have the right to take a person’s property except to guarantee their rights of non-interference.
	7	+
	8	+Reasons to prefer:
	9	+
	10	+1. Philosophies are grounded in the free thought and action of the individual.
	11	+Analytic
	12	+
	13	+Hospers 74:
	14	+From John Hospers, “What Libertarianism Is,” in The Libertarian Alternative, ed. by Tibor R. Machan. © 1974 by Tibor R. Machan. John Hospers is an American philosopher and political activist.
	15	+
	16	+No one is
	17	+AND
	18	+of that life.
	19	+
	20	+Analytic
	21	+2. The Government is an inherently immoral institution- It has a worse track record than the worst criminals. Expanding its power only affirms its legitimacy and puts more power in its hands to coerce and enslave others.
	22	+
	23	+The only justifiable function of the government is to protect citizen rights of non-interference.
	24	+
	25	+Hospers 74:
	26	+
	27	+
	28	+Government is the
	29	+AND
	30	+personal moral code
	31	+
	32	+3. The libertarian value of property is a necessity for life which in turn is a prerequisite to any other framework. Thus, all other frameworks necessitate a libertarian philosophy.
	33	+
	34	+Hospers 74:
	35	+
	36	+Indeed, only if
	37	+AND
	38	+confiscated by government?
	39	+
	40	+Next, I will present my contentions. 1. It is not the taxpayer’s fault that a person is homeless, meaning by libertarianism, the taxpayer doesn’t have the moral obligation to remedy the problem.
	41	+Hospers 74:
	42	+
	43	+Someone across the
	44	+AND
	45	+including Mr. A.
	46	+
	47	+Analytic
	48	+2. The Aff right to housing is equal to moral cannibalism- It sucks on the honest fruits of labor of others and justifies the intervention of the government.
	49	+Hospers 74:
	50	+
	51	+Laws should be
	52	+AND
	53	+expended by others.
	54	+
	55	+3. A right to housing justifies government interference to take people’s property to pay for public housing which is an obvious aspect of the Aff.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2017-04-22 11:53:18.0

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+a

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+a

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+9

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+3

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Memorial Qin Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+MARAPR-NC-Libertarianism

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Space City NSDA