Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[1]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[0]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[1]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2017-02-09 02:18:44.532
	1	+2017-02-09 02:18:44.0

Caselist.CitesClass[0]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,86 @@
	1	+I affirm.
	2	+I value morality.
	3	+
	4	+The standard will be minimizing oppression through open debate and education. Oppression is the biggest impact in the round and morally excludes people, thus making it a prerequisite to morality because morality requires everybody to be factored in.
	5	+Material inequalities are based in moral exclusion, which is flawed because exclusion is not based on dessert but rather on arbitrarily perceived difference.
	6	+Winter and Leighton 1
	7	+Winter, D. D., and Dana C. Leighton." Structural violence." Peace, conflict and violence: Peace psychology for the 21st century (2001): 99-101.
	8	+Finally, to recognize the operation of structural violence forces us to ask questions about how
	9	+AND
	10	+celebrating local cultures, will be our most surefooted path to building lasting peace.
	11	+
	12	+Morality mandates expression of all voices, which necessarily prohibits structural oppression.
	13	+Young 74
	14	+Iris Marion Young, Professor in Political Science at the University of Chicago since 2000, masters and doctorate in philosophy in 1974 from Pennsylvania State University. “Justice and the Politics of Difference”. Princeton University Press, 1990, Digital Copy.
	15	+Group representation, third, encourages the expression of individual ¶ and group needs and interests in terms
	16	+AND
	17	+must listen to the voice of those my privilege otherwise tends to silence.
	18	+
	19	+Advantage 1: Education
	20	+Speech bans significantly harm education and destroys critical thinking skills. Freedom of speech is a prereq to education.
	21	+Zimmer 16:
	22	+Free Speech Is the Basis of a True Education. http://www.wsj.com/articles/free-speech-is-the-basis-of-a-true-education-1472164801 Zimmer is the president of the University of Chicago. Wall Street Journal.
	23	+
	24	+Yet what is the value of a university education without encountering, reflecting on and debating
	25	+AND
	26	+of a true education, and the value of that education is seriously diminished.
	27	+
	28	+Important knowledge and beliefs gained by universities and colleges will be weak when tested in the real world w/o free speech.
	29	+
	30	+Corngold 16:
	31	+Free Speech, Civility, and Censorship in Education. Josh Corngold is the Associate Professor of Educational Studies for the Henry Kendall College of Arts and Sciences at The University of Tulsa. http://education.oxfordre.com/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.001.0001/acrefore-9780190264093-e-163
	32	+
	33	+Besides being protected by the First Amendment, the right of students and faculty to express
	34	+AND
	35	+manner of a prejudice with little comprehension or feeling of its rational grounds.”
	36	+
	37	+Education is the best way to stop hate speech and oppression. By limiting free speech, my opponent destroys education.
	38	+
	39	+Ubangha 16:
	40	+Hate Speech in Cyberspace: Why Education is Better than Regulation. Choice Ubangha does Legal and Social Policy Research, Office Administration, Legal Services, ICT, and is a Human Rights and Social Justice Advocate. Ottawa University. SSRN. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2865053
	41	+
	42	+Education, both formal and informal, has been seen as a vital medium through which youths
	43	+AND
	44	+to raise awareness and empower people to get online in a responsible way.
	45	+
	46	+Education is better than regulation for a multitude of reasons.
	47	+
	48	+Ubangha card 2:
	49	+Hate Speech in Cyberspace: Why Education is Better than Regulation. Choice Ubangha does Legal and Social Policy Research, Office Administration, Legal Services, ICT, and is a Human Rights and Social Justice Advocate. Ottawa University. SSRN. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2865053
	50	+
	51	+1. Regulation does not eliminate the hate from the individuals, it only seeks to supress it.
	52	+AND
	53	+the general populace does not condone hate speech. This will help them psychologically.
	54	+
	55	+My opponent allows hate speech to thrive in the world outside of the college and university campuses, thus harming children and targets of hate speech, usually minorities.
	56	+
	57	+Ubangha 16:
	58	+Hate Speech in Cyberspace: Why Education is Better than Regulation. Choice Ubangha does Legal and Social Policy Research, Office Administration, Legal Services, ICT, and is a Human Rights and Social Justice Advocate. Ottawa University. SSRN. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2865053
	59	+
	60	+Victims of hate speech may usually suffer psychological harm, depression, social withdrawal, loss of self-esteem
	61	+AND
	62	+pathologies associated with social subordination may be transgenerational and long lasting in children
	63	+
	64	+Advantage 2: Oppression
	65	+Free speech allows discriminatory people to be identified and helps solve another root cause of oppression.
	66	+ACLU 16:
	67	+Hate Speech on Campus. https://www.aclu.org/other/hate-speech-campus
	68	+
	69	+Where racist, sexist and homophobic speech is concerned, the ACLU believes that more speech ~-~- not less ~-~-
	70	+AND
	71	+history, and changing curricula to institutionalize more inclusive approaches to all subject matter.
	72	+
	73	+Allowing restrictions on speech just hands a tool to the government to decrease rights because speech is not always clearly defined.
	74	+Malik 12
	75	+(Kenan Malik, I am a writer, lecturer and broadcaster. My latest book is The Quest for a Moral Compass: A Global History of Ethics, “why hate speech should not be banned”, April 12, 2012, https://kenanmalik.wordpress.com/2012/04/19/why-hate-speech-should-not-be-banned/)
	76	+Kenan Malik: I am not sure that ‘hate speech’ is a particularly useful concept. Much
	77	+AND
	78	+certain ideas illegitimate without bothering politically to challenge them. And that is dangerous.
	79	+
	80	+History proves that banning hate speech doesn’t reduce hate violence.
	81	+Malik card 2:
	82	+And in practice, you cannot reduce or eliminate bigotry simply by banning it. You simply
	83	+AND
	84	+threshold for liability should not be lowered just because hate speech is involved.
	85	+
	86	+For all these reasons, I affirm. I now stand open for CX.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2017-02-09 02:18:45.655

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+1

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+1

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Memorial Qin Aff

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+JANFEB-AC-Education

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+UH