| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,11 @@ |
|
1 |
+A. Interpretation: The affirmative cannot read this affirmative, or one specifically that advocates public colleges and universities in the United States ought not restrict constitutionally protected journalist speech. |
|
2 |
+B. |
|
3 |
+C. standard |
|
4 |
+1. The aff is extra-topical |
|
5 |
+States have ruled that the Hazelwood case extends to public colleges and universities This means that that journalism speech in universities is not protected and DIRECTLY addresses your sevent circuit cort decision. Wheeler 15 |
|
6 |
+http://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2015/09/the-plot-against-student-newspapers/408106/, |
|
7 |
+But in a ... papers not reviewable.” |
|
8 |
+ |
|
9 |
+They establish this later more clearly in Hosty v Carter which shows that campuses are allowed under law to have editorial constraints. |
|
10 |
+SMU Law Library (http://library.law.smu.edu/Collections/Ellen-K~-~-Solender-Institute/Case-Summaries/Hosty-v-Carter) |
|
11 |
+Student journalists of ... public forum status. |