| ... |
... |
@@ -1,16
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-A. Link: Martyrdom is necessary for any social movement. In order for the 1AC’s message to be heard to challenge oprpression, that individual must prove their allegiance to the cause by making great sacrifices. DeSoucey 10 |
| 2 |
|
-Martyrs are polysemous ... (and their own) beliefs. |
| 3 |
|
- |
| 4 |
|
-Second, the recognition of sacrifices takes place in a very specific period of time and in a very particular context. DeSoucey 2 |
| 5 |
|
-Ultimately, the role ... within cultural systems. |
| 6 |
|
- |
| 7 |
|
-In our case, the cultural context is this debate round. |
| 8 |
|
- |
| 9 |
|
-B. Impact: Voting affirmative/negative destroys the legitimacy of the affirmative project; the only way to fully endorse embracing suffering is for the affirmative to sacrifice the ballot. Lewis 10 |
| 10 |
|
-Social movements enter ... of assault-and-retaliation sequence. |
| 11 |
|
- |
| 12 |
|
-C. Alternative: I advocate that my opponent should forfeit the round and engage in a discussion with everyone in the room for the remainder of the round. This will improve the efficacy of her message being heard and respected. It’s empirically verified – this is a conversation between Jon Cruz and Amanda Liverzani ~-~-- |
| 13 |
|
-“Jon Cruz asked: ... of them as well.” |
| 14 |
|
-O/W: |
| 15 |
|
-A. empirically verified~-~-your solvency is speculative at best |
| 16 |
|
-B. solves the adversarial nature of debate which is the WORST solvency takeout to your advocacy |