Summary

• Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[3]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[3]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,17 +1,0 @@
1		-Framework
2		-The standard is minimizing existential risk.
3		-1) Extinction precludes all values–
4		-If there’s even a risk of ethical uncertainty, we should always prioritize the survival of the human race to ensure future value. Bostrom 12
5		-Nick Bostrom. Faculty of Philosophy and Oxford Martin School University of Oxford. “Existential Risk Prevention as Global Priority.” Global Policy (2012)
6		-These reflections on …. any existential catastrophe.
7		-Second, Government actions will inevitably lead to trade-offs between citizens since they benefit some and harm others; the only justifiable way to resolve these conflicts is by benefitting the maximum possible number of people since anything else would unequally prioritize one group over another. Several impacts:
8		-a. Side constraint theories are useless for states since they’ll inevitably violate some constraint
9		-b. Answers util indicts since non-consequentialist moral theories prevent any action which is worse than not being able to use util
10		-Third, Extinction outweighs their value to life claims:
11		-A) There's always some value to life in a world where everyone is still alive. Even people who are marginalized find certain joys in life, which are obviously removed by the end of being.
12		-B) Loss of value to life is reversible, while extinction isn't. Means you prefer our impacts since there is always potential to regain life's value AFTER the plan is passed.
13		-C) Even if the world is bad now, it's a comparative question—a nuclear war would clearly harm value to life. Massive starvation, conflict, and collapse of all economic and political checks on violence result in more harm.
14		-
15		-Consequences are the only values we can experience. Harris 10’
16		-Sam Harris 2010. CEO Project Reason; PHD UCLA Neuroscience; BA Stanford Philosophy. The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values.”
17		-I believe that … of all values.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2016-09-11 21:13:10.0

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-hwl

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-3

Round

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-1

Team

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Lynbrook wang Aff

Title

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-SEPTOCT - Util FW v1

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-loyola