Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[3]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[4]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[3]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2016-10-08 21:16:11.723
	1	+2016-10-08 21:16:11.0

Caselist.CitesClass[4]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,25 @@
	1	+Fear of militarization in outer space create securitized discourse and policy – existential threat framing uniquely bad
	2	+Peoples 10 (“The growing ‘securitization’ of outer space”, Columba Peoples, School of Sociology, Politics and International Studies, University of Bristol, 8 October 2010, Space Policy)
	3	+The reasoning behind this introduction of securitization theory here into debates on space policy is
	4	+AND
	5	+that encompass traditional fears of attacks on space assets as an ‘existential threat’
	6	+
	7	+Their securitized approach to political decision making cedes authority to technocratic elites. This shift causes cycles of violence that make global warfare and extinction inevitable.
	8	+Ahmed 11
	9	+2011, Dr. Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed is Executive Director of the Institute for Policy Research and Development IPRD, an independent think tank focused on the study of violent conflict, he has taught at the Department of International Relations, University of Sussex "The international relations of crisis and the crisis of international relations: from the securitisation of scarcity to the militarisation of society" Global Change, Peace 26 Security Volume 23, Issue 3, Taylor Francis
	10	+This analysis thus calls for a broader approach to environmental security based on retrieving the
	11	+AND
	12	+, effective, and joined-up policy-making on these issues.
	13	+
	14	+Thus our alternative is to vote negative as a pedagogical tool to reject their constructed threats – challenging security is the only radical starting point to challenge state power.
	15	+Neocleous 14
	16	+Mark Neocleous is Professor of the Critique of Political Economy at Brunel University, UK; Interview conducted by Gülden Özcan, PhD Student, Department of Sociology, Carleton University, and Ersin Vedat Elgür, PhD, Editor of Nota Bene Publications and teaches at the Department of Philosophy, Dicle University. “A Taste for the Secret: Interview with Mark Neocleous”; October 6, 2014; http://criticallegalthinking.com/2014/10/06/taste-secret-interview-mark-neocleous/
	17	+MN: It is complicated, because if we think in terms of capital as
	18	+AND
	19	+your part in the war power, learn how to police the system.
	20	+
	21	+Our role as intellectuals is not to provide prophetic solutions, but to offer analyses that reveal the problems within hegemonic institutions. Foucault 80
	22	+(Michel, “Questions of Method,” in “The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality,” (1991), by Michel Foucault, Graham Burchell, and Colin Gordon, p. 82-85)
	23	+It's in so far as there's been an awakening to a whole series of problems
	24	+AND
	25	+played out in the real, not when reformers have realized their ideas.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2016-10-08 21:16:12.1

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Nick Steele

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Harker KS

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+3

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Lynbrook Zhu Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+SEPTOCT - Space Securitization K

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Voices