Summary

• Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[16]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[16]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,15 +1,0 @@
1		-These are interps I may read in round
2		-
3		-A. Interpretation: The aff must defend implementation of a policy, specifying the countries it happens in and how it is enforced. They don't need a plan to meet the interp, they just need a stable government action that I can link disads to.
4		-
5		-A. Interpretation: The affirmative must defend a prohibition on nuclear power made by governments
6		-
7		-A. Interpretation: The aff must defend an explicit advocacy text that includes the countries of implementation and type of nuclear power to be prohibited.
8		-
9		-A. Interpretation: The affirmative must defend only a prohibition on the ability of nuclear power to be produced by a country. The aff cannot defend that current reactors be converted to other kinds of reactors.
10		-
11		-A. Interpretation: The affirmative must defend nuclear power prohibition in countries in general. To clarify, they don’t have to defend links to every single country but just as a general principle.
12		-
13		-A. Interpretation: The affirmative must defend prohibiting all forms of nuclear power production.
14		-
15		-A. Interpretation: The affirmative must defend a prohibition only on the production of electric or motive energy through nuclear reactions

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2016-10-08 21:24:04.0

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-x

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-x

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-6

Round

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-1

Team

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Lynbrook Wang Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-SEPOCT - Interps

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-x