Changes for page Lynbrook Wang Neg
Last modified by Administrator on 2017/08/29 03:37
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[15]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2016-10-08 21:24:04. 3021 +2016-10-08 21:24:04.0
- Caselist.CitesClass[16]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,15 @@ 1 +These are interps I may read in round 2 + 3 +A. Interpretation: The aff must defend implementation of a policy, specifying the countries it happens in and how it is enforced. They don't need a plan to meet the interp, they just need a stable government action that I can link disads to. 4 + 5 +A. Interpretation: The affirmative must defend a prohibition on nuclear power made by governments 6 + 7 +A. Interpretation: The aff must defend an explicit advocacy text that includes the countries of implementation and type of nuclear power to be prohibited. 8 + 9 +A. Interpretation: The affirmative must defend only a prohibition on the ability of nuclear power to be produced by a country. The aff cannot defend that current reactors be converted to other kinds of reactors. 10 + 11 +A. Interpretation: The affirmative must defend nuclear power prohibition in countries in general. To clarify, they don’t have to defend links to every single country but just as a general principle. 12 + 13 +A. Interpretation: The affirmative must defend prohibiting all forms of nuclear power production. 14 + 15 +A. Interpretation: The affirmative must defend a prohibition only on the production of electric or motive energy through nuclear reactions - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-10-08 21:24:04.629 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +x - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +x - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +6 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Lynbrook Wang Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +SEPOCT - Interps - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +x