| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,13 @@ |
|
1 |
+First, only impacts and values that exist in the physical world are relevant. Physical realism is the only meaningful ontological theory of being. |
|
2 |
+Donald Williams. “Naturalism and the Nature of Things.” The Philosophical Review, Vol. 53, No. 5 (Sep., 1944), pp. 417-443. Duke UP. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2181355 |
|
3 |
+Casting up our accounts to AND of a spatio-temporal hypersphere |
|
4 |
+Second, consequences are the only values we can experience. Harris 10’ |
|
5 |
+Sam Harris 2010. CEO Project Reason; PHD UCLA Neuroscience; BA Stanford Philosophy. The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values.” |
|
6 |
+I believe that we will AND the foundation of all values. |
|
7 |
+All non-consequentialist theories collapse to consequentialism. Two warrants - first, since real-world acts never contain the certainty necessary for absolute obligations, and second since inaction fails to resolve moral dilemmas. Peterson 10 |
|
8 |
+Peterson 10 “A Royal Road to Consequentialism?” Martin Peterson (Section for Philosophy and Ethics, Eindhoven University of Technology). Ethic Theory Moral Prac (2010) 13:153–169 |
|
9 |
+Briefly put, the main idea AND of a cardinal utility scale. |
|
10 |
+If there’s even a risk of ethical uncertainty, we should always prioritize the survival of the human race to ensure future value. Bostrom 12 |
|
11 |
+Nick Bostrom. Faculty of Philosophy and Oxford Martin School University of Oxford. “Existential Risk Prevention as Global Priority.” Global Policy (2012) |
|
12 |
+These reflections on moral uncertainty AND must prevent any existential catastrophe. |
|
13 |
+The standard is minimizing existential risk |