| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,18 @@ |
|
1 |
+Before we engage in policy discussion, we must examine the media to guarantee undistorted and accurate information. Steuter and Wills 09, |
|
2 |
+Steuter, Erin and Wills, Deborah. “Discourses in Dehumanization: Enemy Construction and Canadian Media Complicity in the Framing of the War on Terror.” Global Media Journal: Volume 2, Issue 2, pp. 7-24 (2009). http://www.gmj.uottawa.ca/0902/v2i2_steuter20and20wills.pdf |
|
3 |
+The data collected in this AND to national, even global safety. |
|
4 |
+The Affirmative neglects key issues of state terror by ignoring politically motivated violence against the East, thereby reflecting the distorted lens of terrorist rhetoric. Kapitan 03, |
|
5 |
+Kapitan, Tomis. “The Terrorism of ‘Terrorism’.” Terrorism and International Justice (Oxford, 2003), 47-66. http://www.niu.edu/phil/~kapitan/pdf/TheTerrorismofTerrorism.pdf |
|
6 |
+A further point is that AND which such judgments give rise. |
|
7 |
+And, the rhetoric of fear around terror recreates and expands itself in the representations of western media and discourse – the threat of terrorism is a social construction. Martin 85, |
|
8 |
+Martin, L. John. “The Media's Role in International Terrorism.” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 1985. http://pegasus.cc.ucf.edu/~surette/mediasrole.html |
|
9 |
+While terrorist incidents are fairly AND drawing power of the story? |
|
10 |
+Impact—misinformation, racism, and genocidal violence against the other—empirics prove we are only a few steps from genocide. Steuter and Wills 09, |
|
11 |
+Steuter, Erin and Wills, Deborah. “Discourses in Dehumanization: Enemy Construction and Canadian Media Complicity in the Framing of the War on Terror.” Global Media Journal: Volume 2, Issue 2, pp. 7-24 (2009). http://www.gmj.uottawa.ca/0902/v2i2_steuter20and20wills.pdf |
|
12 |
+The metaphors that collectively construct AND framed, responded to and understood. |
|
13 |
+Terrorist rhetoric is the root of the problem—turns case. Kapitan 03, |
|
14 |
+Kapitan, Tomis. “The Terrorism of ‘Terrorism’.” Terrorism and International Justice (Oxford, 2003), 47-66. http://www.niu.edu/phil/~kapitan/pdf/TheTerrorismofTerrorism.pdf |
|
15 |
+More dramatically, the ‘terrorist’ rhetoric AND result through violence against civilians. 16 |
|
16 |
+The alternative is rejecting the discourse of terrorism in favor of examining the circumstances wherein violence against civilians is see as a necessary route of resistance. Rejection of this discourse encourages and initiates real political solutions. Kapitan 03, |
|
17 |
+Kapitan, Tomis. “The Terrorism of ‘Terrorism’.” Terrorism and International Justice (Oxford, 2003), 47-66. http://www.niu.edu/phil/~kapitan/pdf/TheTerrorismofTerrorism.pdf |
|
18 |
+There are legitimate ways of AND the civilized discourse of today. 25 |