| ... |
... |
@@ -1,13
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-First, only impacts and values that exist in the physical world are relevant. Physical realism is the only meaningful ontological theory of being. |
| 2 |
|
-Donald Williams. “Naturalism and the Nature of Things.” The Philosophical Review, Vol. 53, No. 5 (Sep., 1944), pp. 417-443. Duke UP. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2181355 |
| 3 |
|
-Casting up our accounts to AND of a spatio-temporal hypersphere |
| 4 |
|
-Second, consequences are the only values we can experience. Harris 10’ |
| 5 |
|
-Sam Harris 2010. CEO Project Reason; PHD UCLA Neuroscience; BA Stanford Philosophy. The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values.” |
| 6 |
|
-I believe that we will AND the foundation of all values. |
| 7 |
|
-All non-consequentialist theories collapse to consequentialism. Two warrants - first, since real-world acts never contain the certainty necessary for absolute obligations, and second since inaction fails to resolve moral dilemmas. Peterson 10 |
| 8 |
|
-Peterson 10 “A Royal Road to Consequentialism?” Martin Peterson (Section for Philosophy and Ethics, Eindhoven University of Technology). Ethic Theory Moral Prac (2010) 13:153–169 |
| 9 |
|
-Briefly put, the main idea AND of a cardinal utility scale. |
| 10 |
|
-If there’s even a risk of ethical uncertainty, we should always prioritize the survival of the human race to ensure future value. Bostrom 12 |
| 11 |
|
-Nick Bostrom. Faculty of Philosophy and Oxford Martin School University of Oxford. “Existential Risk Prevention as Global Priority.” Global Policy (2012) |
| 12 |
|
-These reflections on moral uncertainty AND must prevent any existential catastrophe. |
| 13 |
|
-The standard is minimizing existential risk |