| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,13 @@ |
|
1 |
+A. Debaters must not read contradictory, conditional advocacies. |
|
2 |
+A. The negative must defend their advocacy unconditionally. |
|
3 |
+A. If the negative reads an advocacy, they must specify the status of that advocacy immediately after the advocacy text, or at the beginning of the speech. |
|
4 |
+A. Debaters must state, in their first speech, an advocacy text that states a subject and the action taken towards or by the subject, that is labelled. To clarify, this can even be “I defend the status quo, where \whatever happens\ happens.” |
|
5 |
+A. Kritik alternatives must only be specific, solvent actions implemented by a single actor. The alt must have a solvency advocate that explains the implementation of the action, and cannot fiat a rejection or mindset shift. |
|
6 |
+A. Debaters must read counterplans that are entirely exclusive of the affirmative advocacy. |
|
7 |
+A. If the negative reads a kritik, then they must disclose the alternative text on the NDCA case wiki at least an hour before the round. |
|
8 |
+A. If the negative reads a role of the ballot, then they must disclose the role of the ballot text on the NDCA case wiki at least an hour before the round. |
|
9 |
+A. If the neg justifies a pre-fiat role of the ballot, they must have a text contextualizing how to weigh links back to this role of the ballot delineated in the 1NC. |
|
10 |
+A. If the neg reads a necessary but insufficient burden, then they must concede the AC contention. To clarify, the neg may not read a standard of \neg standard\ and read turns to the AC contention. |
|
11 |
+A. If the affirmative does not claim either permissibility nor presumption, the negative may not read skepticism and claim permissibility and/or presumption negate. |
|
12 |
+A. All T interps must be disclosed on the negative's wiki at least 15 minutes before the round if the aff plan text is disclosed at least 15 minutes before the round. |
|
13 |
+A. Kritiks may not have a mindset shift as the alternative. |