Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[7]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[8]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[7]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2016-10-09 23:03:08.196
	1	+2016-10-09 23:03:08.0

Caselist.CitesClass[8]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,13 @@
	1	+A. Debaters must not read contradictory, conditional advocacies.
	2	+A. The negative must defend their advocacy unconditionally.
	3	+A. If the negative reads an advocacy, they must specify the status of that advocacy immediately after the advocacy text, or at the beginning of the speech.
	4	+A. Debaters must state, in their first speech, an advocacy text that states a subject and the action taken towards or by the subject, that is labelled. To clarify, this can even be “I defend the status quo, where \whatever happens\ happens.”
	5	+A. Kritik alternatives must only be specific, solvent actions implemented by a single actor. The alt must have a solvency advocate that explains the implementation of the action, and cannot fiat a rejection or mindset shift.
	6	+A. Debaters must read counterplans that are entirely exclusive of the affirmative advocacy.
	7	+A. If the negative reads a kritik, then they must disclose the alternative text on the NDCA case wiki at least an hour before the round.
	8	+A. If the negative reads a role of the ballot, then they must disclose the role of the ballot text on the NDCA case wiki at least an hour before the round.
	9	+A. If the neg justifies a pre-fiat role of the ballot, they must have a text contextualizing how to weigh links back to this role of the ballot delineated in the 1NC.
	10	+A. If the neg reads a necessary but insufficient burden, then they must concede the AC contention. To clarify, the neg may not read a standard of \neg standard\ and read turns to the AC contention.
	11	+A. If the affirmative does not claim either permissibility nor presumption, the negative may not read skepticism and claim permissibility and/or presumption negate.
	12	+A. All T interps must be disclosed on the negative's wiki at least 15 minutes before the round if the aff plan text is disclosed at least 15 minutes before the round.
	13	+A. Kritiks may not have a mindset shift as the alternative.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2016-10-09 23:03:08.349

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+x

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+x

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+5

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+1

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Lynbrook Wang Aff

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+1 - Interps

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+x