Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[7]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[8]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[7]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2016-09-12 23:30:17.575
	1	+2016-09-12 23:30:17.0

Caselist.CitesClass[8]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,13 @@
	1	+A. Debaters must not read contradictory, conditional advocacies.
	2	+A. The negative must defend their advocacy unconditionally.
	3	+A. If the negative reads an advocacy, they must specify the status of that advocacy in the speech in which it is read.
	4	+A. Debaters must state, in their first speech, an advocacy text that states a subject and the action taken towards or by the subject, that is labelled. To clarify, they basically must have something like a counterplan text, alt text, etc. This can even be something like “I defend the status quo, where whatever happens happens.”
	5	+A. Kritik alternatives must only be specific, solvent actions implemented by a single actor. The alt must have a solvency advocate that explains the implementation of the action, and cannot fiat a rejection or mindset shift.
	6	+A. Debaters must read counterplans that are entirely exclusive of the affirmative advocacy.
	7	+A. The negative must use only one actor to carry out the actions of the 1NC.
	8	+A. If the negative reads a kritik, then they must disclose the ROB/alt text on the NDCA case wiki at least an hour before the round.
	9	+A. If the neg justifies a pre-fiat role of the ballot, they must have a text contextualizing how to weigh links back to this role of the ballot delineated in text in the 1NC.
	10	+A. If the neg reads a necessary but insufficient burden, then they must concede the AC contention. To clarify, the neg may not read a standard of neg standard and read turns to the AC contention.
	11	+A. If the aff only proves obligation and doesn’t claim presumption or permissibility ground, the neg cannot make multiple independent arguments for moral skepticism, claiming both permissibility and presumption negate without specifying which one skep leads to, and read a counterplan.
	12	+A. All T interps must be disclosed on the opponent's wiki at least 15 minutes before the round if the aff plan text is disclosed at least 15 minutes before the round.
	13	+A. Kritiks may not have a mindset shift as the alternative.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2016-09-12 23:30:17.914

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+x

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+x

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+5

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+1

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Lynbrook Wang Aff

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+1 - Interps

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+x