| ... |
... |
@@ -1,9
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-Here are some interps I think are good for debate |
| 2 |
|
--All T interps must be disclosed on the opponents wiki at least 15 min prior to the round if the aff advocacy is disclosed. |
| 3 |
|
-- Must disclose text of pics 15 min prior to the round if the aff advocacy is disclosed |
| 4 |
|
--if the aff/neg justifies a pre-fiat role of the ballot other than the one the affirmative justifies, he or she must have a text contextualizing what the role of the judge should be delineated via spacing or bolding. |
| 5 |
|
-and how to weigh links back to this role of the ballot within the text clearly |
| 6 |
|
--must spec cp and alternatives status in initial speech that it is read |
| 7 |
|
--may not read kritik alternatives that are not specific policy options if they are not disclosed 15 min before the round |
| 8 |
|
--must delineate advocacy text in initial speech |
| 9 |
|
--If the affirmative has disclosed their advocacy on the wiki AND if the negative is reading a kritik, the negative must have their alternative text disclosed on the NDCA wiki 15 min before the round. |