| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,10 @@ |
|
1 |
+Counterplan text: Public colleges and universities in the United States ought not restrict constitutionally protected speech other than advertising, organization, or membership for IFC fraternities. |
|
2 |
+Fraternities are sites of rape, serious injury, and death. |
|
3 |
+Flanagan 14 (Caitlin, the Atlantic, citing Douglas Fierberg, attorney specializing in fraternity-related litigation, “The Dark Power of Fraternities”, http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/03/the-dark-power-of-fraternities/357580/) |
|
4 |
+“Until proven otherwise,”… a fraternity function. |
|
5 |
+Ban on campus fraternities solves – even banning fraternity advertising alone is good |
|
6 |
+Ryan 14 (Julia, The Atlantic, “How Colleges Could Get Rid of Fraternities”, http://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2014/03/how-colleges-could-get-rid-of-fraternities/284176/) |
|
7 |
+Perhaps the most …as everybody else.” |
|
8 |
+Fraternities are protected by the First Amendment's right to free speech |
|
9 |
+Lukianoff 11 Greg Lukianoff (President and CEO, Foundation for Individual Rights in Education), "To Survive, Fraternities Need to Stand for Something, Anything," Huffington Post, 8/1/2015 |
|
10 |
+A lot of … Education, as well.) |