Changes for page Lynbrook Shah Neg
Last modified by Administrator on 2017/08/29 03:37
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[46]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2017-01-14 00:24:26. 2311 +2017-01-14 00:24:26.0
- Caselist.CitesClass[47]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,20 @@ 1 +Current protections against hate speech are working – on campus harrassment is decreasing nationally now. Sutton 16 2 +Sutton 16 Halley Sutton, Report shows crime on campus down across the country, Campus Security Report 13.4 (2016), 9/9/16,http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/casr.30185/full // 3 +A recent report … offenses and murder. 4 +Removing restrictions on free speech allows hate speech – hate speech IS free speech 5 +Volokh 15 Eugene Volokh,No, There’s No “hate Speech” Exception to the First Amendment, The Washington Post, 5/7/15, https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2015/05/07/no-theres-no-hate-speech-exception-to-the-first-amendment/?utm_term=.05cfdd01dea4 // 6 +I keep hearing … I know of.) 7 +Hate speech normalizes physical and psychological violence and renders educational spaces null and void—it should be banned: the right to free speech is contingent, not absolute 8 +Makes physical violence more likely—empirically proven 9 +Causes psychological harms 10 +Makes educational spaces null and void 11 +Normalizes oppressive practices 12 +Easy to reject from a position of privilege 13 +Heinze 14: Eric Heinze, professor of law and humanities at Queen Mary university of London. March 31, 2014. Nineteen arguments for hate speech bans—and against them. Free Speech Debate. Free speech scholar Eric Heinze identifies the main arguments for laws restricting hate speech and says none are valid for mature Western democracies. http://freespeechdebate.com/en/discuss/nineteen-arguments-for-hate-speech-bans-and-against-them/. HW 14 +On all sides of the debate, we can agree that speech is necessary for democracy. Governments ought not to abridge speech willy-nilly. They must show how the speech in question poses a genuine danger. In the case of hate speech, has any such menace been shown? In my book Hate Speech and Democratic Citizenship, I reject the … historically vilified groups.’ 15 +Hate speech causes less discursive participation and dissent against securitization 16 +Horne 16: Solveigh Horne, Minister of children and equality in Norway. “hate speech—a threat to freedom of speech.” March 8, 2016. Huffington Post. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/solveig-horne/hate-speech~-~-a-threat-to_b_9406596.html. HW 17 +Hate speech in … a fundamental right. 18 +Hate speech leads to a genocidal increase in crimes against marginalized groups. 19 +Greenblatt 15 Jonathan Greenblatt, When Hateful Speech Leads to Hate Crimes: Taking Bigotry Out of the Immigration Debate, Huffington Post, 8/21/15, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jonathan-greenblatt/when-hateful-speech-leads_b_8022966.html // 20 +When police arrived …the ball rolling. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-01-14 00:24:26.843 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Scott Wheeler, David Dosch - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Harker SP - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +24 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +6 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Lynbrook Shah Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +JANFEB - DA - Hate Speech - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Debate LA RR