Summary

• Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[40]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[40]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,9 +1,0 @@
1		-The aff must specify a comprehensive role of the ballot text and clarify how the round will play out under that role of the ballot in the form of a text in the 1AC or on the wiki. To clarify, the aff must:
2		-1. Clarify how we determine what a legitimate advocacy is and how offense links back to the role of the ballot, such as whether topicality constrains the aff advocacy or not.
3		-2. Every plank of the ROB must be warranted, just like the standard text for a normative ethical theory, and what area of debate must be warranted i.e. which assumptions we should accept and which we shouldn’t.
4		-3. Clarify how theory interacts with the aff
5		-4. Describe how to weigh and compare between competing advocacies i.e. whether the role of the ballot is solely determined by the flow or another method of engagement.
6		-5. Specify whether or not they defend implementation
7		-
8		-1. Engagement -
9		-2. Strat Skew -

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2016-10-16 20:53:05.0

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Akhil Gandra

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Montgomery WP

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-20

Round

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-6

Team

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Lynbrook Shah Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-1 - ROB Disclosure

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-St Marks