Changes for page Lynbrook Shah Neg
Last modified by Administrator on 2017/08/29 03:37
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Caselist.RoundClass[20]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2016-10-16 20:53:03. 5401 +2016-10-16 20:53:03.0
- Caselist.CitesClass[40]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,9 @@ 1 +The aff must specify a comprehensive role of the ballot text and clarify how the round will play out under that role of the ballot in the form of a text in the 1AC or on the wiki. To clarify, the aff must: 2 +1. Clarify how we determine what a legitimate advocacy is and how offense links back to the role of the ballot, such as whether topicality constrains the aff advocacy or not. 3 +2. Every plank of the ROB must be warranted, just like the standard text for a normative ethical theory, and what area of debate must be warranted i.e. which assumptions we should accept and which we shouldn’t. 4 +3. Clarify how theory interacts with the aff 5 +4. Describe how to weigh and compare between competing advocacies i.e. whether the role of the ballot is solely determined by the flow or another method of engagement. 6 +5. Specify whether or not they defend implementation 7 + 8 +1. Engagement - 9 +2. Strat Skew - - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-10-16 20:53:05.65 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Akhil Gandra - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Montgomery WP - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +20 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +6 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Lynbrook Shah Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - ROB Disclosure - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +St Marks