Changes for page Lynbrook Shah Neg
Last modified by Administrator on 2017/08/29 03:37
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[27]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,8 +1,0 @@ 1 -Interpretation - Debaters must disclose all broken cases on the NDCA wiki under their own name. In this disclosure, they must post cites, tags, and first three and last three words of all cards read. Debaters may begin disclosing at any point during the season, but they must disclose all broken cases at least an hour before this round in order to meet my interp, regardless of whether the tournament requires disclosure. 2 - 3 -The aff must specify a comprehensive role of the ballot text and clarify how the round will play out under that role of the ballot in the form of a text in the 1AC or on the wiki. To clarify, the aff must: 4 -1. Clarify how we determine what a legitimate advocacy is and how offense links back to the role of the ballot, such as whether topicality constrains the aff advocacy or not. 5 -2. Every plank of the ROB must be warranted, just like the standard text for a normative ethical theory, and what area of debate must be warranted i.e. which assumptions we should accept and which we shouldn’t. 6 -3. Clarify what theoretical objections do and do not link to the aff, and whether or not the aff comes before theory. 7 -4. Describe how to weigh and compare between competing advocacies i.e. whether the role of the ballot is solely determined by the flow or another method of engagement. 8 -5. Specify whether or not they defend implementation - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-10-16 12:11:07.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -x - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -x - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -14 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Lynbrook Shah Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1 - Disclosure - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -x