| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,15 @@ |
|
1 |
+The notion of free speech assumes that all voices are equally treated, when in reality power inequities shape who can speak what |
|
2 |
+Boler 2k Megan Boler (Professor in the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education at the University of Toronto and editor of Digital Media and Democracy), "All Speech is Not Free: The Ethics of "Affirmative Action Pedagogy," Philosophy of Education, 2000 |
|
3 |
+All speech is ... limiting dominant voices. |
|
4 |
+ |
|
5 |
+Free exchange of ideas is outweighed by need for direct action – anything else accepts racism, neoliberalism, and economic inequality as the norm |
|
6 |
+Tillett-Saks 13 Andrew Tillett-Saks (organizer with UNITE HERE Local 217), "Neoliberal Myths," Counterpunch, 11/7/2013 |
|
7 |
+The twofold argument .... always proved necessary. |
|
8 |
+ |
|
9 |
+Racism is the foremost impact and must be rejected in all instances – it makes all ethical action impossible |
|
10 |
+Albert Memmi, Professor Emeritus of Sociology @ U of Paris, Naiteire, Racism, Translated by Steve Martinot, p. 163-165 2000 HW |
|
11 |
+The struggle against ..... stakes are irresistible. |
|
12 |
+ |
|
13 |
+Our alternative is a historicized ethics that reveals the racial contradictions within the law, empowering marginalized voices to overcome current problematic discourse |
|
14 |
+Boler 2k Megan Boler (Professor in the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education at the University of Toronto and editor of Digital Media and Democracy), "All Speech is Not Free: The Ethics of "Affirmative Action Pedagogy," Philosophy of Education, 2000 |
|
15 |
+JUSTIFICATIONS FOR HISTORICIZED..... within our communities.”7 |